scholarly journals A Robot of My Own: Participatory Design of Socially Assistive Robots for Independently Living Older Adults Diagnosed with Depression

2015 ◽  
pp. 104-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selma Šabanović ◽  
Wan-Ling Chang ◽  
Casey C. Bennett ◽  
Jennifer A. Piatt ◽  
David Hakken
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Participatory Design ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Socially Assistive Robots

scholarly journals OLDER ADULTS’ VIEWPOINTS ON SOCIALLY ASSISTIVE ROBOTS DESIGNED TO PROMOTE ENGAGEMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 730-731
Author(s):  
L Mion ◽  
J Fan ◽  
L Beuscher ◽  
M Dietrich ◽  
P Newhouse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Socially Assistive Robots

Socially Assistive Robots, Older Adults and Research Ethics: The Case for Case-Based Ethics Training

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Battistuzzi ◽  
Chris Papadopoulos ◽  
Tetiana Hill ◽  
Nina Castro ◽  
Barbara Bruno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Research Ethics ◽  
Ethics Training ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Socially Assistive Robots ◽  
Case Based

scholarly journals Older adults’ perceptions of Socially Assistive Robots

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Camp Camp ◽  
◽  
Martin Lewis ◽  
Kirsty Hunter ◽  
Daniele Magistro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Socially Assistive Robots

scholarly journals Using socially assistive robots for monitoring and preventing frailty among older adults: a study on usability and user experience challenges

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richelle A. C. M. Olde Keizer ◽  
Lex van Velsen ◽  
Mathieu Moncharmont ◽  
Brigitte Riche ◽  
Nadir Ammour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Socially Assistive Robots

Maximizing the Benefits of Participatory Design for Human–Robot Interaction Research With Older Adults

2021 ◽  
pp. 001872082110374
Author(s):  
Wendy A. Rogers ◽  
Travis Kadylak ◽  
Megan A. Bayles
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Participatory Design ◽  
Aging In Place ◽  
Human Robot Interaction ◽  
Multiple Stakeholders ◽  
Robot Interaction ◽  
Improve Design ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Interaction Research

Objective We reviewed human–robot interaction (HRI) participatory design (PD) research with older adults. The goal was to identify methods used, determine their value for design of robots with older adults, and provide guidance for best practices. Background Assistive robots may promote aging-in-place and quality of life for older adults. However, the robots must be designed to meet older adults’ specific needs and preferences. PD and other user-centered methods may be used to engage older adults in the robot development process to accommodate their needs and preferences and to assure usability of emergent assistive robots. Method This targeted review of HRI PD studies with older adults draws on a detailed review of 26 articles. Our assessment focused on the HRI methods and their utility for use with older adults who have a range of needs and capabilities. Results Our review highlighted the importance of using mixed methods and including multiple stakeholders throughout the design process. These approaches can encourage mutual learning (to improve design by developers and to increase acceptance by users). We identified key phases used in HRI PD workshops (e.g., initial interview phase, series of focus groups phase, and presentation phase). These approaches can provide inspiration for future efforts. Conclusion HRI PD strategies can support designers in developing assistive robots that meet older adults’ needs, capabilities, and preferences to promote acceptance. More HRI research is needed to understand potential implications for aging-in-place. PD methods provide a promising approach.

scholarly journals Toward Monitoring and Increasing Exercise Adherence in Older Adults by Robotic Intervention: A Proof of Concept Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prathik Gadde ◽  
Hadi Kharrazi ◽  
Himalaya Patel ◽  
Karl F. MacDorman
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Exercise Adherence ◽  
Cognitive Stimulation ◽  
Processing Unit ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Socially Assistive Robots ◽  
Vision Processing ◽  
Personal Trainer ◽  
Pencil And Paper

Socially assistive robots have the potential to improve the quality of life of older adults by encouraging and guiding their performance of rehabilitation exercises while offering cognitive stimulation and companionship. This study focuses on the early stages of developing and testing an interactive personal trainer robot to monitor and increase exercise adherence in older adults. The robot physically demonstrates exercises for the user to follow and monitors the user's progress using a vision-processing unit that detects face and hand movements. When the user successfully completes a move, the robot gives positive feedback and begins the next repetition. The results of usability testing with 10 participants support the feasibility of this approach. Further extensions are planned to evaluate a complete exercise program for improving older adults' physical range of motion in a controlled experiment with three conditions: a personal trainer robot, a personal trainer on-screen character, and a pencil-and-paper exercise plan.

Ethics of socially assistive robots in aged-care settings: a socio-historical contextualisation

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-136
Author(s):  
Tijs Vandemeulebroucke ◽  
Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé ◽  
Chris Gastmans
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Ethical Framework ◽  
Ethical Reflection ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Socially Assistive Robots ◽  
Sources Of Knowledge ◽  
Democratic Spaces ◽  
Historical Contextualisation

Different embodiments of technology permeate all layers of public and private domains in society. In the public domain of aged care, attention is increasingly focused on the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) supporting caregivers and older adults to guarantee that older adults receive care. The introduction of SARs in aged-care contexts is joint by intensive empirical and philosophical research. Although these efforts merit praise, current empirical and philosophical research are still too far separated. Strengthening the connection between these two fields is crucial to have a full understanding of the ethical impact of these technological artefacts. To bridge this gap, we propose a philosophical-ethical framework for SAR use, one that is grounded in the dialogue between empirical-ethical knowledge about and philosophical-ethical reflection on SAR use. We highlight the importance of considering the intuitions of older adults and their caregivers in this framework. Grounding philosophical-ethical reflection in these intuitions opens the ethics of SAR use in aged care to its own socio-historical contextualisation. Referring to the work of Margaret Urban Walker, Joan Tronto and Andrew Feenberg, it is argued that this socio-historical contextualisation of the ethics of SAR use already has strong philosophical underpinnings. Moreover, this contextualisation enables us to formulate a rudimentary decision-making process about SAR use in aged care which rests on three pillars: (1) stakeholders’ intuitions about SAR use as sources of knowledge; (2) interpretative dialogues as democratic spaces to discuss the ethics of SAR use; (3) the concretisation of ethics in SAR use.

Acceptability of Socially Assistive Robots Among Cognitively Intact Older Adults: An Integrative Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Melissa Kachaturoff ◽  
Kim Shidler ◽  
Adrienne Fasbinder ◽  
Meriam Caboral-Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Assistive Robots ◽  
Socially Assistive Robots ◽  
Cognitively Intact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document