Group-Sequential and Adaptive Designs

Author(s):  
Geraldine Rauch ◽  
Svenja Schüler ◽  
Meinhard Kieser
2021 ◽  
pp. 235-268
Author(s):  
Ekkehard Glimm ◽  
Lisa V. Hampson

2006 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 732-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gernot Wassmer ◽  
Marc Vandemeulebroecke

2011 ◽  
Vol 67 (8) ◽  
pp. 1824-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ileana Baldi ◽  
Silvia Maria Gouchon ◽  
Paola Di Giulio ◽  
Alessandra Buja ◽  
Dario Gregori

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-331
Author(s):  
Michael John Grayling ◽  
Graham Mark Wheeler

Background/aims: The increasing cost of the drug development process has seen interest in the use of adaptive trial designs grow substantially. Accordingly, much research has been conducted to identify barriers to increasing the use of adaptive designs in practice. Several articles have argued that the availability of user-friendly software will be an important step in making adaptive designs easier to implement. Therefore, we present a review of the current state of software availability for adaptive trial design. Methods: We review articles from 31 journals published in 2013–2017 that relate to methodology for adaptive trials to assess how often code and software for implementing novel adaptive designs is made available at the time of publication. We contrast our findings against these journals’ policies on code distribution. We also search popular code repositories, such as Comprehensive R Archive Network and GitHub, to identify further existing user-contributed software for adaptive designs. From this, we are able to direct interested parties toward solutions for their problem of interest. Results: Only 30% of included articles made their code available in some form. In many instances, articles published in journals that had mandatory requirements on code provision still did not make code available. There are several areas in which available software is currently limited or saturated. In particular, many packages are available to address group sequential design, but comparatively little code is present in the public domain to determine biomarker-guided adaptive designs. Conclusions: There is much room for improvement in the provision of software alongside adaptive design publications. In addition, while progress has been made, well-established software for various types of trial adaptation remains sparsely available.


2021 ◽  
pp. 096228022110432
Author(s):  
Jannik Feld ◽  
Andreas Faldum ◽  
Rene Schmidt

Whereas the theory of confirmatory adaptive designs is well understood for uncensored data, implementation of adaptive designs in the context of survival trials remains challenging. Commonly used adaptive survival tests are based on the independent increments structure of the log-rank statistic. This implies some relevant limitations: On the one hand, essentially only the interim log-rank statistic may be used for design modifications (such as data-dependent sample size recalculation). Furthermore, the treatment arm allocation ratio in these classical methods is assumed to be constant throughout the trial period. Here, we propose an extension of the independent increments approach to adaptive survival tests that addresses some of these limitations. We present a confirmatory adaptive two-sample log-rank test that allows rejection regions and sample size recalculation rules to be based not only on the interim log-rank statistic, but also on point-wise survival rate estimates, simultaneously. In addition, the possibility is opened to adapt the treatment arm allocation ratio after each interim analysis in a data-dependent way. The ability to include point-wise survival rate estimators in the rejection region of a test for comparing survival curves might be attractive, e.g., for seamless phase II/III designs. Data-dependent adaptation of the allocation ratio could be helpful in multi-arm trials in order to successively steer recruitment into the study arms with the greatest chances of success. The methodology is motivated by the LOGGIC Europe Trial from pediatric oncology. Distributional properties are derived using martingale techniques in the large sample limit. Small sample properties are studied by simulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document