Mutual Gaze

Author(s):  
Sally J. Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Chidchanok Thepsoonthorn ◽  
Takahiro Yokozuka ◽  
Jinhwan Kwon ◽  
Robin Mia Sin Yap ◽  
Shunsuke Miura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1980 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Mazur ◽  
Eugene Rosa ◽  
Mark Faupel ◽  
Joshua Heller ◽  
Russell Leen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M. Egbert

ABSTRACTJust as turn-taking has been found to be both context-free and context-sensitive (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson 1974), the organization of repair is also shown here to be both context-free and context-sensitive. In a comparison of American and German conversation, repair can be shown to be context-free in that, basically, the same mechanism can be found across these two languages. However, repair is also sensitive to the linguistic inventory of a given language; in German, morphological marking, syntactic constraints, and grammatical congruity across turns are used as interactional resources. In addition, repair is sensitive to certain characteristics of social situations. The selection of a particular repair initiator, Germanbitte?‘pardon?’, indexes that there is no mutual gaze between interlocutors; i.e., there is no common course of action. The selection ofbitte?not only initiates repair; it also spurs establishment of mutual gaze, and thus displays that there is attention to a common focus. (Conversation analysis, context, cross-linguistic analysis, repair, gaze, telephone conversation, co-present interaction, grammar and interaction)


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. P. Curtin ◽  
Mark E. Hauber ◽  
Peter Moller

Author(s):  
Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini ◽  
Hiromasa Tanaka
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129
Author(s):  
Janice C. Sinson ◽  
N. E. Wetherick
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Nilsson ◽  
Stefan Norrthon ◽  
Jan Lindström ◽  
Camilla Wide

Abstract While greetings are performed in all cultures and open most conversations, previous studies suggest that there are cross-cultural differences between different languages in greeting behavior. But do speakers of different national varieties of the same language organize and perform their greeting behavior in similar ways? In this study, we investigate the sequential organization of greetings in relation to gaze behavior in the two national varieties of Swedish: Sweden Swedish spoken in Sweden and Finland Swedish spoken in Finland. In recent years, the importance of studying pluricentric languages from a pragmatic perspective has been foregrounded, not least within the framework of variational pragmatics. To date, most studies have focused on structural differences between national varieties of pluricentric languages. With this study, we extend the scope of variational pragmatics through adding an interactional, micro perspective to the broader macro analysis typical of this field. For this study, we have analyzed patterns for greetings in 297 video-recorded service encounters, where staff and customers interact at theatre box offices and event booking venues in Sweden and Finland. The study shows that there are similarities and differences in greeting behavior between varieties. There is a strong preference for exchanging reciprocal verbal greetings, one at a time, in both. There is also a similar organization of the greeting sequence, where customer and staff establish mutual gaze prior to the verbal greetings, thus signaling availability for interaction. The duration of mutual gaze and the timing of the greeting, however, differ between the two varieties. We have also conducted a multi modal analysis of gaze behavior in correlation to the greeting. We found that the customers and staff in the Finland Swedish data share mutual gaze before and during the verbal greeting, and often avert gaze after the verbal greetings. However, in the Sweden Swedish data, the participants often avert gaze before the verbal greetings. Our results thus indicate that both similarities and differences in pragmatic routines and bodily behavior exist between the two national varieties of Swedish. The present study on greeting practices in Finland Swedish and Sweden Swedish should contribute to the field of variational pragmatics and to the development of pluricentric theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document