Chapter 5 extends this implementation to interrogative sentences,
accounting for the various behaviors of evidentials in questions. Not
only does this extension provide support for the proposed analysis of
evidentials, it provides support for the general semantics for mood.
Interrogativemood is treated as a different kind of illocutionary relation,
but evidentials still contribute not‐at‐issue content. In combination,
they account for a range of properties, including the flip interpretation
of evidentials, where the addressee has evidence for one of the answers
to the question.
Learning Dynamics with Synchronous, Asynchronous and General Semantics