Learning of Ordered Tree Languages with Height-Bounded Variables Using Queries

Author(s):  
Satoshi Matsumoto ◽  
Takayoshi Shoudai
2019 ◽  
Vol E102.D (3) ◽  
pp. 470-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki UCHIDA ◽  
Satoshi MATSUMOTO ◽  
Takayoshi SHOUDAI ◽  
Yusuke SUZUKI ◽  
Tetsuhiro MIYAHARA

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 640-654
Author(s):  
N. Lekkoksung ◽  
K. Denecke
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 279-299
Author(s):  
Alberto Pettorossi

In this paper we consider combinators as tree transducers: this approach is based on the one-to-one correspondence between terms of Combinatory Logic and trees, and on the fact that combinators may be considered as transformers of terms. Since combinators are terms themselves, we will deal with trees as objects to be transformed and tree transformers as well. Methods for defining and studying tree rewriting systems inside Combinatory Weak Reduction Systems and Weak Combinatory Logic are also analyzed and particular attention is devoted to the problem of finiteness and infinity of the generated tree languages (here defined). This implies the study of the termination of the rewriting process (i.e. reduction) for combinators.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Michael Benedikt ◽  
Clemens Ley
Keyword(s):  

Algorithmica ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Magniez ◽  
Michel de Rougemont

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 257-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREAS MALETTI ◽  
CĂTĂLIN IONUŢ TÎRNĂUCĂ

The fundamental properties of the class QUASI of quasi-relabeling relations are investigated. A quasi-relabeling relation is a tree relation that is defined by a tree bimorphism (φ, L, ψ), where φ and ψ are quasi-relabeling tree homomorphisms and L is a regular tree language. Such relations admit a canonical representation, which immediately also yields that QUASI is closed under finite union. However, QUASI is not closed under intersection and complement. In addition, many standard relations on trees (e.g., branches, subtrees, v-product, v-quotient, and f-top-catenation) are not quasi-relabeling relations. If quasi-relabeling relations are considered as string relations (by taking the yields of the trees), then every Cartesian product of two context-free string languages is a quasi-relabeling relation. Finally, the connections between quasi-relabeling relations, alphabetic relations, and classes of tree relations defined by several types of top-down tree transducers are presented. These connections yield that quasi-relabeling relations preserve the regular and algebraic tree languages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document