Consultative Opinion on Liability of Public and Private Actors for Genetic Contamination of Non-GM Crops

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-272
Author(s):  
San Sebastian
Keyword(s):  
Full Text ◽  
Gm Crops ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Genetic Contamination ◽  
Private Actors

An abridged version of the Consultative Opinion is presented here. For details of the full text readers are advised to contact the ICEAC.

The Panama Tall and the Maypan hybrid coconut in Jamaica: did genetic contamination cause a loss of resistance to Lethal Yellowing?

Euphytica ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Baudouin ◽  
Patricia Lebrun ◽  
Angélique Berger ◽  
Wayne Myrie ◽  
Basil Been ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Contamination ◽  
Loss Of Resistance ◽  
Lethal Yellowing

scholarly journals Genetic differences between substrains of the inbred mouse strain 101 and designation of a new strain 102

1985 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. West ◽  
Mary F. Lyon ◽  
Josephine Peters ◽  
Paul B. Selby
Keyword(s):  
Inbred Strain ◽  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Mouse Strain ◽  
Inbred Mouse ◽  
Inbred Mouse Strain ◽  
Genetic Differences ◽  
The Other ◽  
Genetic Loci ◽  
Genetic Contamination

SUMMARYGenetic polymorphisms revealed two distinct substrains of the inbred strain 101. One group included substrains 101*/Rl, 101/H and 101/HOxe; the other group comprised 101/El and 101/Sl. The two groups differed at 5 of the 8 genetic loci tested. The accompanying paper (Evans, Burtenshaw & Adler, 1985) shows that the two groups also differ for several chromosome polymorphisms. We suggest that genetic contamination occurred during the derivation of 101/El from 101/Rl and was already present in 101/El when 101/Sl was produced from this substrain. We further propose that these substrains be renamed 102/El and 102/Sl respectively.

Identification of a genetic contamination in a commercial mouse strain using two panels of polymorphic markers

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Nitzki ◽  
A Kruger ◽  
K Reifenberg ◽  
L Wojnowski ◽  
H Hahn
Keyword(s):  
Mouse Strain ◽  
Polymorphic Markers ◽  
Genetic Contamination

High Levels of Genetic Contamination in Remnant Populations of Acacia saligna from a Genetically Divergent Planted Stand

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Millar ◽  
Margaret Byrne ◽  
Ian K. Nuberg ◽  
Margaret Sedgley
Keyword(s):  
Acacia Saligna ◽  
Genetic Contamination

Evidence for genetic contamination of inbred Buffalo rats (RT-1b) obtained from a commercial vendor

1994 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Jones ◽  
Andrew Weinberg ◽  
Dennis Bourdette
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Contamination ◽  
Commercial Vendor

Influence of isolation distance on genetic contamination of field bean (Vicia faba L.) seed produced in small plots

1975 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pope ◽  
D. A. Bond
Keyword(s):  
Vicia Faba ◽  
Genetic Markers ◽  
Field Bean ◽  
Seed Colour ◽  
Experimental Field ◽  
Genetic Contamination ◽  
Vicia Faba L ◽  
Breeding Programmes ◽  
Isolation Distance

SUMMARYUse of flower and seed colour genetic markers showed that in plots, each 4·5 m × 4·5 m in size, the genetic contamination decreased from 16·96% at 0·9 m to 1·25% at 92 m, and 0·59% at 184 m distance. Maximum contamination from other Viciafaba outside the experimental field and at least 1·1 km away was 0·44%. Implications for the multiplication of stocks in breeding programmes are discussed.

Difference in average survival between F344/Du and F344/N rats is not due to genetic contamination

2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Tanaka ◽  
Akihito Shito ◽  
Norika Tamaya ◽  
Osamu Miyaishi ◽  
Masahiko Nishimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Contamination ◽  
Average Survival
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document