scholarly journals Two Variable vs. Linear Temporal Logic in Model Checking and Games

Author(s):  
Michael Benedikt ◽  
Rastislav Lenhardt ◽  
James Worrell
2012 ◽  
Vol 601 ◽  
pp. 401-405
Author(s):  
Wen Bo Zhou ◽  
Shu Zhen Yao

The degree of flexibility of workflow management systems heavily influences the way business processes are executed. Constraint-based models are considered to be more flexible than traditional models because of their semantics: everything that does not violate constraints is allowed. More and more people use declarative languages to define workflow, such as linear temporal logic. But how to guarantee the correctness of the model based on the linear temporal logic is still a problem. This article proposes a way to verify the model based on Büchi automaton and gives the corresponding algorithms. Thus the verification of declarative workflow based on the linear temporal logic is solved.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
GIORGIO BACCI ◽  
GIOVANNI BACCI ◽  
KIM G. LARSEN ◽  
RADU MARDARE

We study two well-known linear-time metrics on Markov chains (MCs), namely, the strong and strutter trace distances. Our interest in these metrics is motivated by their relation to the probabilistic linear temporal logic (LTL)-model checking problem: we prove that they correspond to the maximal differences in the probability of satisfying the same LTL and LTL−X(LTL without next operator) formulas, respectively.The threshold problem for these distances (whether their value exceeds a given threshold) is NP-hard and not known to be decidable. Nevertheless, we provide an approximation schema where each lower and upper approximant is computable in polynomial time in the size of the MC.The upper approximants are bisimilarity-like pseudometrics (hence, branching-time distances) that converge point-wise to the linear-time metrics. This convergence is interesting in itself, because it reveals a non-trivial relation between branching and linear-time metric-based semantics that does not hold in equivalence-based semantics.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur Mȩski ◽  
Wojciech Penczek ◽  
Maciej Szreter ◽  
Bożena Woźna-Szcześniak ◽  
Andrzej Zbrzezny

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 469-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAJDEEP NIYOGI

Planning with temporally extended goals has recently been the focus of much attention to researchers in the planning community. We study a class of planning goals where in addition to a main goal there exist other goals, which we call auxiliary goals, that act as constraints to the main goal. Both these type of goals can, in general, be a temporally extended goal. Linear temporal logic (LTL) is inadequate for specification of the overall goals of this type, although, for some situations, it is capable of expressing them separately. A branching-time temporal logic, like CTL, on the other hand, can be used for specifying these goals. However, we are interested in situations where an auxiliary goal has to be satisfiable within a fixed bound. We show that CTL becomes inadequate for capturing these situations. We bring out an existing logic, called min-max CTL, and show how it can effectively be used for the planning purpose. We give a logical framework for expressing the overall planning goals. We propose a sound and complete planning procedure that incorporates a model checking technology. Doing so, we can answer such planning queries as plan existence at the onset besides producing an optimal plan (if any) in polynomial time.


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miaolei Deng ◽  
Kai Nie ◽  
Weijun Zhu ◽  
Chunyan Zhang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document