Results of eye lens dose measurements for interventional cardiology staff

Author(s):  
V. Antic ◽  
O. Ciraj-Bjelac ◽  
S. Aleksandric ◽  
M. Ostojic
2012 ◽  
Vol 154 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Antic ◽  
O. Ciraj-Bjelac ◽  
M. Rehani ◽  
S. Aleksandric ◽  
D. Arandjic ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-379
Author(s):  
Predrag Bozovic ◽  
Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac ◽  
Jelena Stankovic-Petrovic ◽  
Danijela Arandjic ◽  
Sandra Ceklic

Medical staff performing interventional procedures in cardiology and radiology is considered to be a professional group exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation. With new epidemiological evidences and recently reduced eye lens dose limit, dose assessment to the lens of the eye, in the interventional cardiology, has become one of the most challenging research topics. This paper presents results of the eye lens dose assessment in interventional cardiology obtained by means of the computational dosimetry. Since placing and wearing the dedicated eye lens dosimeter is encumbering for the staff, Monte Carlo simulation provides an accurate and efficient method for obtaining an indication of doses to the eye lenses. Eye lens doses were estimated for three typical beam projections (PA, LAO, and RAO) and tube voltages ranging from 80 kV to 110 kV, with different protective equipment setups, for the first operator position. Simulations were carried out using MCNPX code. Results revealed that a whole body dosimeter worn at the thyroid center position gives the best estimate of the eye lens dose with a spread from 11 % to 18 % for the left eye. Corresponding average conversion coefficient from whole body to the eye lens dose is estimated to be 0.18.


2014 ◽  
Vol 164 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Principi ◽  
M. Ginjaume ◽  
M. A. Duch ◽  
R. M. Sanchez ◽  
J. M. Fernandez ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anchali Krisanachinda ◽  
Suphot Srimahachota ◽  
Kosuke Matsubara

2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Predrag Božović ◽  
Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac ◽  
Jelena Stanković Petrović

Abstract Medical personnel performing interventional procedures in cardiology and radiology is considered to be a professional group exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation. Reduction of the eye lens dose limit made its assessment in the interventional procedures one of the most challenging topics. The objective of this work is to assess eye lens doses based on the whole-body doses using methods of computational dosimetry. Assessment included different C-arm orientations (PA, LAO and RAO), tube voltages (80 –110 kV) and efficiency of different combinations of protective equipment used in interventional procedures. Center position at the height of the thyroid gives best estimate of eye lens dose, with spreads of 11% (13%), 13% (17%) and 14% (13%) for the left (right) eye lens. The conversion factors of 1.03 (0.83), 1.28 (1.06) and 1.36 (1.06) to convert whole body to eye lens dose were derived for positions of first operator, nurse and radiographer, respectively. The eye lens dose reduction factors for different combinations of applied protective equipment are 178, 5 and 6, respectively.


2015 ◽  
Vol 165 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Principi ◽  
C. Delgado Soler ◽  
M. Ginjaume ◽  
M. Beltran Vilagrasa ◽  
J. J. Rovira Escutia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margherita Betti ◽  
Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni ◽  
Giacomo Belli ◽  
Luca Bernardi ◽  
Sara Bicchi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1126) ◽  
pp. 20210436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. Schueler ◽  
Kenneth A Fetterly

Data suggest that radiation-induced cataracts may form without a threshold and at low-radiation doses. Staff involved in interventional radiology and cardiology fluoroscopy-guided procedures have the potential to be exposed to radiation levels that may lead to eye lens injury and the occurrence of opacifications have been reported. Estimates of lens dose for various fluoroscopy procedures and predicted annual dosages have been provided in numerous publications. Available tools for eye lens radiation protection include accessory shields, drapes and glasses. While some tools are valuable, others provide limited protection to the eye. Reducing patient radiation dose will also reduce occupational exposure. Significant variability in reported dose measurements indicate dose levels are highly dependent on individual actions and exposure reduction is possible. Further follow-up studies of staff lens opacification are recommended along with eye lens dose measurements under current clinical practice conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document