Strategic Trade and International Competition Policy

Author(s):  
Rainer Markl ◽  
Werner Meissner
2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-335
Author(s):  
Gary Hufbauer ◽  
Jisun Kim

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Keldon Bester ◽  
Jacqueline Byers

Abstract Amid a global uptick in public interest in competition policy, questions have emerged about the fitness of tools available to international competition authorities, particularly in relation to the digital economy. Treatment of mergers has come under increased scrutiny, and while the competitive analysis of mergers is a rich vein of debate, equally important is the question of which mergers competition authorities decide to analyse at all. We provide a brief overview of the Canadian approach to pre-merger notification, the emerging challenges associated with but not limited to the digital economy, and the Canadian response thus far.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 20160025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Budzinski

Lead jurisdiction models represent one option how to extend and enhance contemporary interagency cooperation among competition policy regimes. They constitute a multilateral, case-related form of cooperation that is suited to effectively create a one-stop-shop for the prosecution of international cartels, the handling of cross-border mergers and acquisitions and the governance of international antitrust cases. Thus, lead jurisdiction models offer considerable economic benefits. However, they also entail several caveats. Three possible working problems and downside effects of lead jurisdiction models in international competition policy enforcement are discussed in this paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document