Introduction to Failings of Risk Management in the Global Financial Crisis and Beyond to the Australian Banking Royal Commission Enquiry into Banking Misconduct

2021 ◽  
pp. 1023-1044
Author(s):  
Francesco de Zwart
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-16
Author(s):  
Sayed M. Fadel ◽  
Jasim Al-Ajmi

The objectives of this study are to determine 1) the effect of global economic and financial crisis on risk management, 2) the severity of different types of risk facing Islamic banks, 3) the risk levels of Islamic financial modes, 4) risk assessment techniques, and 5) risk management techniques. The structure of the balance sheet, the nature of Islamic finance instruments and funding sources have a great impact on the level of risk exposure of banks and the instruments. Credit risk is found to be the most serious risk, followed by liquidity risk, market risk and operational risk, in descending order of importance. As for the riskiness of Islamic financing modes, mudarabah is perceived to be the riskiest, followed by musharakah, while murabahah ranked as the least risky mode. Moreover, Islamic banks are found to use traditional risk management techniques more than sophisticated measurements. They also adopt risk mitigation techniques that are used by conventional banks in preference to techniques that are considered to be unique to Islamic banks. This paper is the first to study the risk management practices of Islamic banks operating in Bahrain. It also provides evidence about these practices after the global financial crisis that affected all countries, including Bahrain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-132
Author(s):  
Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq ◽  
Rabaka Akter ◽  
Tanmay Biswas

This aim of the article is to establish a model to discuss the reasons for changing the level of credit risk among the commercial banks of Bangladesh during the global financial crisis (GFC). Credit risk has been remaining as the essential and core risk in commercial banking activities. Multiple regression analysis is used to test the relationship among the level of credit risk as a dependent variable and financial crisis, other bank-level variables and macroeconomic variables. The causes of the GFC revealed not only systematic or structural imbalances but also the necessity to keep and strengthen the principles of credit risk management. We analyse the leading causes of the recent GFC. Moreover, the lessons that must be learnt from the weaknesses of credit risk management systems. Credit risk was found to respond to macroeconomic conditions, which indicate strong feedback effects from the banking system to the real economy. This article represents the analysis of the influence of the financial crisis on credit risk management in commercial banks and summarizes the challenges faced by banks for credit risk improvement. We hope that this reality creates new opportunities for managing credit risk in the future to increase this importance in the banks and the overall economy of Bangladesh.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosnadzirah Ismail ◽  
Rashidah Abdul Rahman ◽  
Normah Ahmad

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none; mso-hyphenate: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: AR-SA; mso-themecolor: text1;">The East Asian financial crisis in 1997 and later the global financial crisis in 2007 and 2008 had a big impact on the corporate world as many companies and financial institutions collapsed during that period.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Poor governance systems and lack of transparency in reporting including lack of risk reporting and disclosure were blamed as the roots of the problem.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: AR-SA; mso-themecolor: text1;">Conventional financial institutions have widely practiced risk management within their organization, but it is still under-developed in Islamic financial institutions due to new emerging market and unique business structures which are based on Shariah or Islamic law.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Therefore, t</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: black; font-size: 10pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: AR-SA; mso-themecolor: text1;">his study examined the risk management disclosure by all 17 Islamic financial institutions in Malaysia from 2006 to 2009, covering the period before, during, and after the global financial crisis.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>A disclosure checklist consists of mandatory and voluntary items developed to measure the level of risk disclosure.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The descriptive result shows the risk management disclosure among the Islamic Financial Institutions was satisfactory.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Analysis for a four year period revealed that the risk disclosure has greatly improved before and after crisis indicating that Islamic Financial Institutions have taken the necessary steps to improve their disclosure.</span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>


Author(s):  
Mccormick Roger ◽  
Stears Chris

This chapter discusses the initial impact of the global financial crisis, covering the seize-up of the inter-bank market; the run on Northern Rock in September 2007; the ‘regulatory failure’ in the UK and proposed changes; other UK financial institution failures, near failures, and rescues; and US financial market problems. It argues that throughout history, there have been episodes of over-eager lending, reckless investing and poor risk management, leading to financial failure and calls for help. Although the recent crisis was supposedly different because the securitization of debt gave the appearance of liquidity and sophisticated risk management, it also had the same common themes of greed and stupidity.


Author(s):  
Mccormick Roger ◽  
Stears Chris

Despite being over a decade on from and the onset of the global financial crisis, organisations are still battling to regain the trust that was lost. A bank whose business practices might be applauded on the basis of its financial performance might be harbouring an unidentified/unmitigated level of conduct risk that could undermine its sustainability and trustworthiness. One way that stakeholders can assess the bank’s culture, conduct and ultimately, its trustworthiness and ‘investment value’ is through the use of metrics. This chapter explores the use of metrics for both conduct and reputational risk management. It focuses on the use of ‘conduct costs’ as a metric for internal risk management, as well as its potential to serve as a simple, yet defining metric for non-financial performance, firm culture and trust, from an external stakeholder assessment perspective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document