Theor of free choice permission

Topoi ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Free Choice Permission

Free choice permission and the counterfactuals of pragmatics

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Fusco
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Free Choice Permission

scholarly journals Free choice permission as resource-sensitive reasoning

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Barker
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Free Choice Permission

IV—Free Choice Permission

1974 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Kamp
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Free Choice Permission

A Pragmatic Solution for the Paradox of Free Choice Permission

Synthese ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Schulz
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Free Choice Permission

scholarly journals Free Choice Permission in Defeasible Deontic Logic

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Governatori ◽  
Antonino Rotolo
Keyword(s):  
Deontic Logic ◽  
Free Choice ◽  
Restricted Form ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Free Choice Permission

Free Choice Permission is one of the challenges for the formalisation of norms. In this paper, we follow a novel approach that accepts Free Choice Permission in a restricted form. The intuition behind the guarded form is strongly aligned with the idea of defeasibility. Accordingly, we investigate how to model the guarded form in Defeasible Deontic Logic extended with disjunctive permissions.

A Pragmatic Solution for the Paradox of Free Choice Permission

2005 ◽  
pp. 289-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Schulz
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Free Choice Permission

scholarly journals Expressing Permission

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 325 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Starr
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Deontic Modals ◽  
New Information ◽  
Classical Behavior ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Free Choice Permission

This paper proposes a semantics for free choice permission that explains both the non-classical behavior of modals and disjunction in sentences used to grant permission, and their classical behavior under negation. It also explains why permissions can expire when new information comes in and why free choice arises even when modals scope under disjunction. On the proposed approach, deontic modals update preference orderings, and connectives operate on these updates rather than propositions. The success of this approach stems from its capacity to capture the difference between expressing the preferences that give rise to permissions and conveying propositions about those preferences. 

Free Choice Permission is Strong Permission

Synthese ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Asher ◽  
Daniel Bonevac
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Free Choice Permission
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document