Aberrant right subclavian artery-esophageal fistula: A cause of overwhelming upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage

1984 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod I. Belkin ◽  
Frederick S. Keller ◽  
Edwin C. Everts ◽  
Josef Rösch
2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 389-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Millar ◽  
Alaa Rostom ◽  
Pasteur Rasuli ◽  
Nav Saloojee

An aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is a common aortic arch abnormality. A case of a 57-year-old man presenting with melena and hypotension secondary to an ARSA-esophageal fistula is reported. The current report is unique because it is the first reported case of ARSA-esophageal fistula associated with prior esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. A MedLine search was performed for ARSA-esophageal fistula cases, which were then compared with the present case. Because this patient had no vascular conduits, nasogastric or endotracheal tubes, the fistula likely occurred secondary to the previous surgery. This case is unusual because the patient survived the original hemorrhage associated with the ARSA-esophageal fistula.An ARSA-esophageal fistula is a rare, but potentially fatal cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. A high index of suspicion is needed to make the diagnosis. This condition should be considered in patients with risk factors combined with hemodynamically significant gastrointestinal bleeding.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1551-1552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Lescot ◽  
Constantine J. Karvellas ◽  
Paola Sanchez-Pena ◽  
Mamadou Deme ◽  
Lamine Abdennour

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 078-092
Author(s):  
Chhagan L. Birda ◽  
Antriksh Kumar ◽  
Jayanta Samanta

AbstractNonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH) is a common GI emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Triaging cases on the basis of patient-related factors, restrictive blood transfusion strategy, and hemodynamic stabilization are key initial steps for the management of patients with NVUGIH. Endoscopy remains a vital step for both diagnosis and definitive management. Multiple studies and guidelines have now defined the optimum timing for performing the endoscopy after hospitalization, to better the outcome. Conventional methods for achieving endoscopic hemostasis, such as injection therapy, contact, and noncontact thermal therapy, and mechanical therapy, such as through-the-scope clips, have reported to have 76 to 90% efficacy for primary hemostasis. Newer modalities to enhance hemostasis rates have come in vogue. Many of these modalities, such as cap-mounted clips, coagulation forceps, and hemostatic powders have proved to be efficacious in multiple studies. Thus, the newer modalities are recommended not only for management of persistent bleed and recurrent bleed after failed initial hemostasis, using conventional modalities but also now being advocated for primary hemostasis. Failure of endotherapy would warrant radiological or surgical intervention. Some newer tools to optimize endotherapy, such as endoscopic Doppler probes, for determining flow in visible or underlying vessels in ulcer bleed are now being evaluated. This review is focused on the technical aspects and efficacy of various endoscopic modalities, both conventional and new. A synopsis of the various studies describing and comparing the modalities have been outlined. Postendoscopic management including Helicobacter pylori therapy and starting of anticoagulants and antiplatelets have also been outlined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document