Can neoclassical economics be social economics?

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Rima
Keyword(s):  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Social Economics

Can neoclassical economics be social economics? A comment

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Weintraub
Keyword(s):  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Social Economics

Can neoclassical economics become social economics?

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Elliott ◽  
Hans Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Social Economics

Can neoclassical economics be social economics?

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren Samuels
Keyword(s):  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Social Economics

Sociological dimensions in classical/neoclassical economics: Conceptions of social economics and economic sociology

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milan Zafirovski
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Economic Theory ◽  
Economic Sociology ◽  
Rational Choice Theory ◽  
Choice Theory ◽  
Social Economy ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Social Economics ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Classical Political Economy

This article posits that traditional economics contains relevant sociological dimensions and that these consist primarily of conceptions and elements of social economics or economic sociology. On this premise, it explores these sociological dimensions in the form of conceptions and elements of social economics and/or economic sociology in classical political economy and neoclassical economics. The article identifies explicit conceptions of social economics such as the proposal for social economy and the idea of economic sociology as well as its implicit versions, including its implications in ‘purest’ economic theory. Alternatively, the article finds no important sociological dimensions in the form of rational choice theory, i.e. the ‘economics of society’, in classical and neoclassical economic science. The article reconsiders economics and sociology in their shared elements or complementary relations as ‘sister’ social sciences.

A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics: Effects of tasks, age, and social economics status.

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Peng ◽  
Tengfei Wang ◽  
CuiCui Wang ◽  
Xin Lin
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Intelligence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Social Economics

Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie im 21. Jahrhundert.

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (188) ◽  
pp. 453-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Peter Büttner
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
Critical Theory ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
New World ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Price Theory ◽  
Transformation Problem ◽  
Iron Cage ◽  
Analytical Tools

While the majority of the scientific community holds Marxian Value and Price Theory to be internally inconsistent because of the so-called “transformation problem”, these claims can be sufficiently refuted. The key to the solution of the “transformation problem” is quite simple, so this contribution, because it requires the rejection of simultanism and physicalism, which represent the genuine method of neoclassical economics, a method that is completely incompatible with Marxian Critique of Political Economy. Outside of the iron cage of neoclassical equilibrium economics, Marxian ‘Capital’ can be reconstructed without neoclassical “pathologies” and offers us a whole new world of analytical tools for a critical theory of capitalist societies and its dynamics.

IRVING FISHER AND THE MECHANISTIC CHARACTER OF TWENTIETH CENTURY ACCOUNTING THOUGHT

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Mouck
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Twentieth Century ◽  
World View ◽  
Neoclassical Economic ◽  
Neoclassical Economics ◽  
Newtonian Mechanics ◽  
Neoclassical Economic Theory

This paper provides an overview of the influence of Newtonian mechanics on the development of neoclassical economic theory and highlights Fisher's role in the popularization of the resulting mechanical conception of economics. The paper also portrays Fisher's The Nature of Capital and Income — a work which has been aptly characterized as the “first economic theory of accounting” — as the first move toward the colonization of accounting by economics. The result of Fisher's influence has been a paradigmatic linkage between the Newtonian world view of science, neoclassical economics, and mainstream academic accounting thought. The picture that emerges from this linkage is then used as a backdrop against which the emerging challenges to economics-based accounting thought are highlighted.

The Institute of Social Economics: A Neglected Network in New York's Progressive Community

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-296
Author(s):  
Stephen Leccese
Keyword(s):  
Social Economics
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document