Proximal Splenic Artery Embolization In Blunt Splenic Trauma

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osnat Zmora ◽  
Yitzhak Kori ◽  
David Samuels ◽  
Ada Kessler ◽  
Carl I. Schulman ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Majd Habash ◽  
Darrel Ceballos ◽  
Andrew J. Gunn

AbstractThe spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable due to splenic trauma undergo definitive operative management. Interventional radiology plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of the hemodynamically stable trauma patient with splenic injury. Hemodynamically stable patients selected for nonoperative management have improved clinical outcomes when splenic artery embolization is utilized. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, technical aspects, and clinical outcomes of splenic artery embolization for patients with high-grade splenic injuries.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
CP Chou ◽  
YH Kim ◽  
S Tresoldi ◽  
EI Tikh ◽  
S Baker ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of superselective splenic artery embolization (SAE) using a coaxial catheter technique in patients with blunt splenic injury. Patient Selection and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of 24 consecutive patients undergoing splenic angiography for blunt splenic injury at a Level 1 trauma center. After angiographic confirmation of splenic injury, superselective SAE was performed using gelfoam pledgets (n=15), with or without coils, and liquid embolic materials (n=9). All procedures were performed through a microcatheter advanced coaxially through a selective angiographic catheter. Severity of splenic injury was graded using CT imaging. The angiographic findings were retrospectively divided into four groups. Outcome measures included technical success, complications and recurrence of symptoms requiring additional intervention or surgery despite embolization. Results: All cases were technically successful, with immediate occlusion of targeted vessels after embolization. One patient underwent distal pancreatectomy- splenectomy 3 days after splenic embolization due to symptoms related to distal pancreatic injury, unrelated to the angiographic intervention. A second embolization was performed 1-3 days after initial embolization in 4 patients with clinical suspicion of re-bleeding. One of these four patients underwent splenectomy 3 days after the second embolization, during exploration for associated bowel and diaphragmatic injury. A second patient underwent splenectomy 1 day after a second embolization due to need for continued transfusions. The splenic salvage rate was not significantly related to CT grade of splenic injury (p=1.0) or angiographic classification (p=0.8). Conclusion: Superselective SAE can be performed as a safe alternative to splenectomy in patients with blunt splenic trauma, particularly when there is no additional major organ injury. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njr.v3i2.9606 Nepalese Journal of Radiology Vol.3(2)July-Dec, 2013: 37-48


1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (05) ◽  
pp. 310-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Uroz Tristan ◽  
D. Poenaru ◽  
F. Martinez Lagares ◽  
S. Leclerc ◽  
L. Sanchis Solera

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2016020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Molica ◽  
Fulvio Massaro ◽  
Giorgia Annechini ◽  
Erminia Baldacci ◽  
Gianna maria D'elia ◽  
...  

Selective splenic artery embolization (SSAE) is a nonsurgical intervention characterized by the transcatheter occlusion of the splenic artery and/or its branch vessels using metallic coils or other embolic devices. It has been applied for the management of splenic trauma, hypersplenism with portal hypertension, hereditary spherocytosis, thalassemia and splenic hemangioma. We hereby describe a case of a patient affected by idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and warm auto-immune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) both resistant to immunosuppressive and biological therapies, not eligible for a surgical intervention because of her critical conditions. She underwent SSAE and achieved a hematologic complete response within a few days without complications. SSAE is a minimally invasive procedure to date not considered a standard option in the management of AIHA and ITP. However, following the progressive improvement of the techniques, its indications have been extended, with a reduction in morbidity and mortality compared to splenectomy in patients with critical clinical conditions. SSAE was a lifesaving therapeutic approach for our patient and it may represent a real alternative for the treatment of resistant AIHA and ITP patients not eligible for splenectomy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 197 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akpofure Peter Ekeh ◽  
Brent Izu ◽  
Mark Ryan ◽  
Mary C. McCarthy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document