scholarly journals On the Apéry sets of monomial curves

2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Cortadellas Benítez ◽  
Raheleh Jafari ◽  
Santiago Zarzuela Armengou
Keyword(s):  
1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1907-1912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margherita Barlie ◽  
Marcel Morales
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Li ◽  
D. P. Patil ◽  
Leslie G. Roberts
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria E. de Quehen ◽  
Leslie G. Roberts

AbstractWe find an infinite family of projective monomial curves all of which have h-vector with no negative values and are not Cohen–Macaulay.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (04) ◽  
pp. 629-642
Author(s):  
Anargyros Katsabekis

Let C(n) be a complete intersection monomial curve in the 4-dimensional affine space. In this paper we study the complete intersection property of the monomial curve C(n + wv), where w > 0 is an integer and v ∈ ℕ4. In addition, we investigate the Cohen–Macaulayness of the tangent cone of C(n + wv).


1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 2639-2649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolos Thoma
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 872-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Kraft

Let 2 ≦ s ∊ N and {n1, …, ns) ⊆ N*. In 1884, J. Sylvester [13] published the following well-known result on the singularity degree S of the monomial curve whose corresponding semigroup is S: = 〈n1, …, ns): If s = 2, thenLet K: = –Z\S andfor all 1 ≦ i ≦ s. We introduce the invariantof S involving a correction term to the Milnor number 2δ [4] of S. As a modified version and extension of Sylvester's result to all monomial space curves, we prove the following theorem: If s = 3, thenWe prove similar formulas for s = 4 if S is symmetric.


2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-238
Author(s):  
MESUT ŞAHİN

We study an operation, that we call lifting, creating nonisomorphic monomial curves from a single monomial curve. Our main result says that all but finitely many liftings of a monomial curve have Cohen–Macaulay tangent cones even if the tangent cone of the original curve is not Cohen–Macaulay. This implies that the Betti sequence of the tangent cone is eventually constant under this operation. Moreover, all liftings have Cohen–Macaulay tangent cones when the original monomial curve has a Cohen–Macaulay tangent cone. In this case, all the Betti sequences are just the Betti sequence of the original curve.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document