Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions secondary to endovascular aneurysm therapy: nickel allergy or foreign body reaction? Case series and review of the literature

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 877-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eimad Shotar ◽  
Bruno Law-Ye ◽  
Flore Baronnet-Chauvet ◽  
Sinead Zeidan ◽  
Dimitri Psimaras ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596711881160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Paul Sinagra ◽  
Alan Kop ◽  
Moreica Pabbruwe ◽  
Jeremy Parry ◽  
Gavin Clark

Background: Artificial ligaments have been developed and used in the treatment of ligamentous injuries since the 1970s. The early generation of artificial ligaments showed promising short-term results but resulted in high rates of rupture and inflammatory reaction in the surrounding tissues. Purpose: To determine whether the use of Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) ligaments is associated with the development of intra-articular foreign body reaction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: LARS ligaments were explanted from 15 patients under 6 consultant orthopaedic surgeons at 8 surgical centers. Of these, 14 explanted samples were sent for macroscopic and histological analysis, with the 1 remaining sample sent for scanning electron microscopy, to assess for inflammatory change as well as the degree of fibrous tissue ingrowth. Results: We observed a foreign body reaction in 10 of 14 explanted LARS ligaments. Seven samples demonstrated fibrous tissue ingrowth, with 5 producing only focal or incomplete ingrowth. The 2 samples with extensive fibrous coverage were completely free of any foreign body reaction, while all 5 remaining samples with only focal or partial fibrous ingrowth were associated with at least some degree of harmful immune response. Conclusion: The LARS ligament is still associated with a clinically significant degree of foreign body reaction despite the LARS Company’s efforts to reduce complications through improved design. The development and completion of fibrous tissue ingrowth may work to reduce the occurrence of a foreign body reaction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-236
Author(s):  
Christina M. Low Kapalu ◽  
Nadia Ibrahimi ◽  
Janelle M. Mentrikoski ◽  
Thomas Attard

2000 ◽  
Vol 196 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Winkler ◽  
Christopher Herzog ◽  
Christoph Weiler ◽  
Kartik G. Krishnan

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Rathy Ravindran ◽  
Anila Karunakaran

Orofacial granulomatosis is a granulomatous disease of orofacial region, which can occur for a variety of reasons. The clinical features are highly variable and sometimes so insidious that signs and symptoms are not frequently severe to cause alarm. The lips are most commonly involved with persistent/recurrent swelling. The medical history is very important as Crohn’s disease and sarcoidosis can present oral manifestation. Other causes like mycobacterial infection, foreign body reaction, fungal infection, and allergy were excluded with further investigation to establish diagnosis. Here and we report a case of orofacial granulomatosis with a review of the literature.


1998 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.Eric Pecha ◽  
Thomas Prindiville ◽  
Ronald Kotfila ◽  
Boris Ruebner ◽  
Anthony T. Cheung ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Dragu ◽  
Frank Unglaub ◽  
Stephan Schwarz ◽  
Justus P. Beier ◽  
Ulrich Kneser ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno C. Jham ◽  
Nikolaos G. Nikitakis ◽  
Mark A. Scheper ◽  
John C. Papadimitriou ◽  
Bernard A. Levy ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1473-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilemachos Kavvadias ◽  
Daniel Kaemmer ◽  
Uwe Klinge ◽  
Stefanie Kuschel ◽  
Bernhard Schuessler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document