The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)

Urolithiasis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junhong Fan ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Alberto Gurioli ◽  
Irene Raphael Ketegwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Shockwave Lithotripsy ◽  
Lower Pole ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm

Urolithiasis ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Kirac ◽  
Ömer Faruk Bozkurt ◽  
Lutfi Tunc ◽  
Cagri Guneri ◽  
Ali Unsal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Lower Pole ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10–20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 2621-2628 ◽  
Author(s):  
José D. Cabrera ◽  
Braulio O. Manzo ◽  
José E. Torres ◽  
Fabio C. Vicentini ◽  
Héctor M. Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Lower Pole ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

scholarly journals Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Miniaturised Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy to Treat Lower Pole Renal Stone < 2 cms Diameter in Western Part of Odisha

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (19) ◽  
pp. 1347-1351
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar Nayak ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Mahapatra ◽  
Braja Mohan Mishra ◽  
Dipti Ranjan Dhar ◽  
Biswajit Sahu
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Lower Pole ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
The Mean

BACKGROUND We wanted to compare the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in treating lower pole (LP) renal stones with a diameter of < 2 cm in terms of safety, efficacy, and stonefree rate (SFR). METHODS In a retrospective analysis data of 39 patients who underwent mini-PCNL (N = 19) or RIRS (N = 20) for LP stones with a diameter of < 2 cm were reviewed between November 2018 and November 2020 at the Department of Urology in Veer Surendra Sai Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (VSSIMSAR), Odisha. The mean age, sex, stone size, operating time, complications, hospital stay, and SFR were compared between the groups. The success of the procedure was defined as the absence of residual stones or small residuals of size 3mm or less on computed tomography at 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS Significant differences were found in the hospital stay duration in hours (103.3 ± 11.7 vs. 145.2 ± 16.4, P < 0.028) between the RIRS and mini - PCNL groups. The mean operation time (in minutes) was also significantly different between the RIRS group (82.5 ± 3.44) and mini PCNL group (86.21 ± 5.90, P = 0.021). The stonefree rates in the postoperative period at three months (RIRS vs. mini - PCNL: 95 % vs. 94 %, P = 0.47) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS RIRS and mini-PCNL are both safe and effective methods for treating LP stones with a diameter of < 2 cm. RIRS can be considered as a less invasive alternative to PCNL for the treatment of LP stones of < 2 cm with reasonable SFR with shorter hospital stay. KEYWORDS Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy, Lower Pole Kidney Stones, Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document