scholarly journals Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized clinical study

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1877-1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Carbonel ◽  
Angel Antonio Martinez ◽  
Angel Calvo ◽  
Jorge Ripalda ◽  
Antonio Herrera
Author(s):  
Brian D. Dierckman ◽  
Petros Frousiakis ◽  
Joseph P. Burns ◽  
F. Alan Barber ◽  
Ross Wodicka ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 2091-2098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teruhisa Mihata ◽  
Chisato Watanabe ◽  
Kunimoto Fukunishi ◽  
Mutsumi Ohue ◽  
Tomoyuki Tsujimura ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Hantes ◽  
Yohei Ono ◽  
Vasilios A. Raoulis ◽  
Nikolaos Doxariotis ◽  
Aaron Venouziou ◽  
...  

Background: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and double-row (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid- to long-term clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya’s classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [ P < .05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [ P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [ P < .05]). Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.


Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (29) ◽  
pp. e21030
Author(s):  
Yanming Lin ◽  
Jiasong Zhao ◽  
Heng Qiu ◽  
Yong Huang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document