scholarly journals Retrograde ejaculation after retroperitoneal lower lumbar interbody fusion

1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. B. Christensen ◽  
C. E. Bünger
2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 566-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Hun Pee ◽  
Ki Joon Kim ◽  
Young-Geun Choi ◽  
Sang Hyeop Jeon ◽  
Jong Dae Park ◽  
...  

✓ In this report, the authors present the case of patient with a lymphocele in the retroperitoneal area following anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4–5. A lymphocele is a rare complication of spinal operations, especially lower lumbar spinal surgeries. The authors discuss this complicating factor and describe its features and treatments.


Spine ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1023-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick C. Sasso ◽  
J. Kenneth Burkus ◽  
Jean-Charles LeHuec

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (videosuppl1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurpreet S. Gandhoke ◽  
Christian Ricks ◽  
Zachary Tempel ◽  
Brian Zuckerbraun ◽  
D. Kojo Hamilton ◽  
...  

In deformity surgery, anterior lumbar interbody fusion provides excellent biomechanical support, creates a broad surface area for arthrodesis, and induces lordosis in the lower lumbar spine. Preoperative MRI, plain radiographs, and, when available, CT scan should be carefully assessed for sacral slope as it relates to pubic symphysis, position of the great vessels (especially at L4/5), disc space height, or contraindication to an anterior approach. This video demonstrates the steps in an anterior surgical procedure with minimal open exposure.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/r3bC4_vu1hQ.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 511-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene J. Carragee ◽  
Kyle A. Mitsunaga ◽  
Eric L. Hurwitz ◽  
Gaetano J. Scuderi

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Marotta ◽  
Murat Cosar ◽  
Luiz Pimenta ◽  
Larry T. Khoo

Object The authors describe a new paracoccygeal approach to the L5–S1 junction for interbody fusion with transsacral instrumentation. The purpose of this technical note is to demonstrate a novel surgical approach, technique, and instrumentation system for the treatment of L5–S1 instability in degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis. Methods This technical note highlights the AxiaLif (TranS1) transsacral system as an alternative method to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Via a novel presacral approach corridor, a truly percutaneous L5–S1 discectomy, interbody distraction, and fixation are achieved, and retroperitoneal viscera and dorsal neural elements are avoided. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is then used to provide additional stabilization at the treated level. Conclusions This novel technique of interbody distraction and fusion via a truly percutaneous approach corridor allows for circumferential treatment of the lower lumbar segments with minimal risk to the anterior organs and dorsal neural elements.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoquan Zheng ◽  
Chunguo Wang ◽  
Tianhao Wang ◽  
Wenhao Hu ◽  
Quanbo Ji ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: adjacent segment disease (ASD) is an acknowledged problem of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Many studies have been reported concerning the role of lordosis distribution index (LDI) in spinal biomechanics. However, few reports have been published about the impact of LDI on ASD following L4-S1 PLIF.Methods:The study enrolled 200 subjects who underwent L4-S1 PLIF for degenerative spine disease from 2009 to 2014. The average follow-up term was 84 months. Several lower lumbar parameters were measured, including lower lumbar lordosis (LLL), lumbar lordosis (LL) ,pelvic incidence (PI) and LDI on the pre- and postoperative radiograph. Perioperative information, comorbidities and operative data were documented. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for the comparisons of ASD-free survival of 3 different types of postoperative LDI subgroups.Results: The incidence of ASD was found to be 8.5%. LL and LLL increased by 3.96°(38.71° vs 42.67° , P<0.001) and 3.60° (26.22° vs 28.82° , P<0.001) after lower lumbar fusion surgery, respectively. Lordosis distribution index (LDI) increased by 0.03 (0.66 vs 0.69, P=0.004) postoperatively. A significant difference(P=0.001) was observed when comparing the incidence of ASD among postoperative LDI subgroups.The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a marked difference in ASD-free survival between low and moderate LDI subgroup (Log Rank test, P=0.0012) , high and moderate LDI subgroup (Log Rank test, P=0.0005)Conclusion: Patients with abnormal postoperative LDI were statistically more likely to develop ASD than those who had normal postoperative LDI. Moreover, patients with low postoperative LDI were at greater risk for developing ASD than those with high postoperative LDI over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document