scholarly journals Components Separation Technique Combined with a Double-Mesh Repair for Large Midline Incisional Hernia Repair

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 2399-2402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirelle Bröker ◽  
Emiel Verdaasdonk ◽  
Tom Karsten
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Separation Technique ◽  
Components Separation ◽  
Components Separation Technique

Laparoscopically assisted components separation technique for ventral incisional hernia repair

Hernia ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan L. Milburn ◽  
Paulesh K. Shah ◽  
Erica B. Friedman ◽  
J. Scott Roth ◽  
Grant V. Bochicchio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Separation Technique ◽  
Components Separation ◽  
Ventral Incisional Hernia ◽  
Components Separation Technique

scholarly journals Role of laparoscopy in incisional hernia and relative benefit of the laparoscopic incisional hernia repair to the open incisional hernia repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 2165
Author(s):  
Sudhir Singh Pal ◽  
Azad Kumar Mourya
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Open Mesh Repair

Background: Incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery. Historically the open repair with or without mesh was the mainstay of treatment. However, many recently published laparoscopic repair studies have challenged surgeons to re-evaluate which technique provides the best short and long term outcomes.Methods: The study was conducted on 50 patients admitted at GMC Bhopal with approval from college ethical committee.Results: In 50 cases 21 were male and 29 were female. 7 male (14%) and 15 female (30%) patients had undergone laproscopic mesh repair (LMR) and 14 male (28%) and 14 female (28%) patients had undergone open mesh repair (OMR). Total complication in OMR group is 10 (35%) and in LMR group is 2 (9.09%). Mean duration of hospital stay in LMR group was 6.6 days and in OMR group was 15.57 days. Post-operative patients of LMR group returned back to the work early (mean 12 days) compared to OMR group (mean 20.7 days). Mean post-operative day of movement in LMR group was 1 day and in OMR group was 2.03 days. Pain measured using visual analogue score on 3rd post-operative day showed decreased pain score in laparoscopic group (mean 2) compared to open group (mean 5.35).Conclusions: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair provides lesser post-operative pain, lesser complications, shorter hospital stay and lesser economic impact as they returned to work early. Thus patients have less morbidity and improved quality of life. 

Is Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair an Available Option for Incisional Hernia Repair? A Retrospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Cano-Valderrama ◽  
JosÉ L. Porrero ◽  
Esther Quirós ◽  
Oscar Bonachia ◽  
MarÍA J. Castillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Polypropylene Mesh ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Hernia Recurrence ◽  
Onlay Mesh

Lately, incisional hernia repair (IHR) with onlay polypropylene mesh has been replaced by other surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the complication and recurrence rate after onlay mesh repair and other surgical procedures for IHR. A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IHR in a single center was conducted. The data were obtained from electronic medical records. Patients who had been lost during follow-up were contacted for a visit in the clinic. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed with Stata 13.0 to analyze the factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence. Between June 2004 and December 2015, 1078 patients underwent IHR in a single center. Onlay mesh repair was performed in 125 patients (11.6%). Other surgical procedures included Rives procedure (29.3%), sublay mesh repair (38.6%), intrabdominal mesh repair (17.1%), and primary closure (3.4%). After a mean follow-up of 2.8 years, 73 (7%) patients developed a recurrence. A higher percentage of complications were seen after onlay mesh repair than after other surgical procedures (22.4% vs 13.1%, P = 0.005). Nevertheless, recurrence was less frequent after onlay mesh repair (4.2% vs 7.1%, P = 0.241). Logistic regression discarded an association between onlay mesh repair and hernia recurrence or postoperative complications. Incisional hernia repair with onlay polypropylene mesh repair was not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications or recurrence rate. So, this procedure should not be discarded in selected patients presenting with incisional hernia.

Components-separation technique for closure of transverse non-midline abdominal wall incisional hernia

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Espinosa-de-los-Monteros ◽  
Bernardo Franssen ◽  
Vicente Orozco ◽  
Juan Carlos Arriola ◽  
Héctor Romero
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Separation Technique ◽  
Components Separation ◽  
Components Separation Technique

scholarly journals Plastic treatment for giant pseudocyst after incisional hernia mesh repair: a case report and comprehensive literature review

Open Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 539-543
Author(s):  
Marius Kryzauskas ◽  
Vytautas Lipnickas ◽  
Simonas Uselis ◽  
Donatas Danys ◽  
Kestutis Strupas
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Fluid Collection ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Hernia Mesh ◽  
Hernia Mesh Repair ◽  
Low Prevalence ◽  
Giant Pseudocyst

AbstractGiant pseudocyst is a very rare complication after incisional hernia repair with mesh. We present a case of 54-year-old male patient with a giant pseudocyst, which developed after incisional hernia repair with mesh. A patient was discussed during multidisciplinary team meeting and operative treatment was suggested to the patient. Extirpation of the cyst was accomplished. There was observed no defect in the abdominal wall. The patient was discharged on the 7th postoperative day. Ultrasonography two weeks after discharge again showed fluid collection. There were 6 aspirations every week starting from 400 ml serous fluid at the beginning and 60 ml at the end. There were no signs of fluid collection one month after the last aspiration. Surgical plastic treatment of giant pseudocyst after incisional hernia mesh repair is safe and feasible despite its low prevalence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document