World Journal of Surgery
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

14403
(FIVE YEARS 2543)

H-INDEX

144
(FIVE YEARS 25)

Published By Springer-Verlag

1432-2323, 0364-2313

Author(s):  
Hironori Ishibashi ◽  
Ryo Wakejima ◽  
Ayaka Asakawa ◽  
Yusuke Sugita ◽  
Yuya Ishikawa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Salvatore Paiella ◽  
Matteo De Pastena ◽  
Alessandro Esposito ◽  
Erica Secchettin ◽  
Luca Casetti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To compare the postoperative course of elderly patients (≥70 years) submitted to minimally invasive (MIDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) and to evaluate if the modified Frailty Index (mFI) predicts the surgical course of elderly patients submitted to DP. Methods Data of patients aged ≥70 who underwent DP at a single institution between March 2011 and December 2019 were retrospectively retrieved. A 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to correct for differences in baseline characteristics. Then, postoperative complications were compared between the two groups (MIDP vs. ODP). Additionally, the entire cohort of DP elderly patients was stratified according to the mFI into three groups: non-frail (mFI = 0), mildly frail (mFI = 1/2), or severely frail (mFI = 3) and then compared. Results A total of 204 patients were analyzed. After PSM, 40 MIDP and 80 ODP patients were identified. The complications considered stratified homogenously between the two groups, with no statistically significant differences. The severity of the postoperative course increased as mFI did among the three groups regarding any complication (p = 0.022), abdominal collection (p = 0.014), pulmonary complication (p = 0.001), postoperative confusion (p = 0.047), Clavien-Dindo severity ≥3 events (p = 0.036), and length of stay (p = 0.018). Conclusions Elderly patients can be safely submitted to MIDP. The mFI identifies frail elderly patients more prone to develop surgical and non-surgical complications after DP.


Author(s):  
Luis Alvarado ◽  
Nishtha Sharma ◽  
Roxann Lerma ◽  
Alok Dwivedi ◽  
Adeel Ahmad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with end stage renal disease on dialysis is associated with bone pain and fractures in addition to cardiovascular morbidity. Cinacalcet is the most commonly used drug to treat such patients, but it has never been compared to surgery. The goal of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes and survival between cinacalcet and parathyroidectomy in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients. Methods Adult patients on hemodialysis who were treated with cinacalcet or parathyroidectomy in the United States Renal Data System were included. Patients treated with surgery (n = 2023) were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching ratio to a cohort of patients treated with cinacalcet. A Cox regression analysis was conducted to compare the overall mortality. Results The propensity score matching successfully created two groups with similar demographics. Patients in the surgery group had a higher mean peak PTH level prior to therapy (2066.8 vs 1425.4, P < 0.001). No difference was observed in the development of new-onset coronary artery disease (7.7% vs 7.9%, P = 0.8) or cerebrovascular disease (7% vs 6.7%, P = 0.8). Surgical patients had a higher rate of pathologic fractures (27.8% vs 24.9%, P = 0.04). Survival analysis showed that patients undergoing surgery had a better 5-year survival (65.6% vs 57.8%) and were less likely to die within the study period (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.7–0.85, P < 0.0001). Conclusions Patients on dialysis undergoing parathyroidectomy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism have a better overall survival than those treated with cinacalcet.


Author(s):  
Francisca Vieira da Silva Caldeira de Albuquerque ◽  
Marina Felicidade Dias-Neto ◽  
João Manuel Palmeira da Rocha-Neves ◽  
Pedro José Vinhais Domingues Videira Reis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document