TO EVALUATE EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSPERITONEAL PYELOLITHOTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF RENAL PELVIC STONES IN TERM OF POSTOPERATIVE HOSPITAL STAY

Background: To evaluate efficacy of laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of renal pelvic stones in term of postoperative hospital stay Methods: This study has been conducted in the Department of General surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla on selected patients of Renal pelvis stones admitted in institution Results: Mean hospital stay was 6.66 days in laparoscopic group and it was 8 days in laparoscopic completed by open method. Maximum no. of patients was discharged within 5 days. 6 (75 %) patients returned to normal activity in less than 30 days which included only successful laparoscopic group and 2 patients returned to normal activity in 40 days which included lap completed by open group. Conclusion: In the present study of Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithotomy at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, the procedure showed a definite decrease hospital stay, early return to activity than who have undergone open surgery Keywords: Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithotomy, Pelvic stone, Hospital stay.

Clinical outcome of appendectomy: laparoscopic vs open technique

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common abdominal surgical emergency. Appendectomy has been proven to be the standard care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Objective of the study was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of clinical outcome and complication rates.Methods: This was a single centric, retrospective study conducted at SKIMS, Soura from May 2018 to April 2021. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy patients were compared in terms of operative times, conversion rate, complication rates and duration of hospital stay.Results: Total 120 patients were included in this study with 40 in laparoscopic group while 80 patients in the open group. Increased operative time in laparoscopic group (p=0.033) and longer duration of hospital stay (p=0.021) with open group while as comparable complication rate in both procedures were observed. Higher rates of intra-abdominal collection in laparoscopic group as compared to open groupConclusions: Both laparoscopic and open appendectomy procedures can be performed routinely for acute appendicitis without the additional risks of complications.

Performance with robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D­laparoscopy during pancreatic and biliary anastomoses in a biotissue model: pooled analysis of two randomized trials

Background Robotic surgery may improve surgical performance during minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy but comparative studies are lacking. This study assessed the impact of robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy on surgical performance and operative time using a standardized biotissue model for pancreatico- and hepatico-jejunostomy using pooled data from two randomized controlled crossover trials (RCTs). Methods Pooled analysis of data from two RCTs with 60 participants (36 surgeons, 24 residents) from 11 countries (December 2017–July 2019) was conducted. Each included participant completed two pancreatico- and two hepatico-jejunostomies in biotissue using 3D-robotic surgery, 3D-laparoscopy, or 2D-laparoscopy. Primary outcomes were the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS: 12–60) rating, scored by observers blinded for 3D/2D and the operative time required to complete both anastomoses. Sensitivity analysis excluded participants with excess experience compared to others. Results A total of 220 anastomoses were completed (robotic 80, 3D-laparoscopy 70, 2D­laparoscopy 70). Participants in the robotic group had less surgical experience [median 1 (0–2) versus 6 years (4–12), p < 0.001], as compared to the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery resulted in higher OSATS ratings (50, 43, 39 points, p = .021 and p < .001) and shorter operative time (56.5, 65.0, 81.5 min, p = .055 and p < .001), as compared to 3D- and 2D­laparoscopy, respectively, which remained in the sensitivity analysis. Conclusion In a pooled analysis of two RCTs in a biotissue model, robotic surgery resulted in better surgical performance scores and shorter operative time for biotissue pancreatic and biliary anastomoses, as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic and open operations in the treatment of hepatic echinococcosis. Analysis of short- and long-term results

Aim: to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open operations in the treatment of hepatic echinococcosis.Materials and methods. The results of laparoscopic and open echinococcectomies performed from 2013 to 2020 were retrospectively studied. Laparoscopic operations were considered the method of choice. Open operations were performed in cases with contraindications to the laparoscopic approach.Results. In total, 57 patients were operated: 47 laparoscopically (including robotic approach in 4 cases), 9 patients underwent open surgery. Radical procedures prevailed among laparoscopic cystectomies: 46 (98%). In the groups of laparoscopic/open cystectomies, partial pericystectomy was performed in 1/3 of patients, subtotal – in 24/4, total – in 13/0, and liver resection – in 9/2 patients, respectively. Laparoscopic procedures were performed mainly for types 1 and 3 of cysts, open procedures – for type 2 (WHO), recurrent and extrahepatic abdominal cysts were indication for open surgery. The frequency of severe complications did not differ between the groups. In the laparoscopic group, 1 (2%) patient died. After laparoscopic cystectomies, the mean (median) hospital stay (8 vs 10 days) and duration of abdominal drainage (10 vs 12 days) were significantly shorter. Relapse occurred only after conservative cystectomies, in one patient in each group.Conclusion. Laparoscopic radical surgery for liver hydatid cysts may be the method of choice if performed in a specialized HPB center. Patient selection criteria should be based on the center's experience in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Emergency Surgery for Colorectal Perforation: A Retrospective Study

Background This study aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal perforation by comparing the clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open emergency surgery for colorectal perforation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 100 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal perforation. The patients were categorized into two groups: the open group included patients who underwent laparotomy, and the laparoscopic group included those who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Clinical and operative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Results The open and laparoscopic groups included 58 and 42 patients, respectively. More than half of the patients in both groups developed perforation in the sigmoid colon (open, 55.2%; laparoscopic, 59.5%). The most common cause of perforation was diverticulum, followed by colorectal cancer. The mean intraoperative blood loss tended to be lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (78.8 mL versus 160.1 mL; P=0.0756). Hospital stay tended to be shorter in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (42.5 versus 55.7 days; P=0.0965). There were no significant differences in either the short- or long-term outcomes between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the choice of surgical approach (open versus laparoscopic) did not affect overall survival in patients with colorectal perforation. Conclusions The laparoscopic approach for colorectal perforation in an emergency setting is a safe procedure compared with the open approach. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and a shorter length of hospital stay.

Differences in Outcome Between Open vs Laparoscopic Insertion of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts

Background Abdominal access during ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion has historically been obtained by neurosurgeons via an open abdominal approach. With recent advances in laparoscopy, neurosurgeons frequently consult general surgery for aid during the procedure. The goal of this study is to identify if laparoscopic assistance improves the overall outcomes of the procedure. Methods This retrospective study included all patients who underwent open or laparoscopic VP shunt placement between September 2012 and August 2020 at our tertiary referral hospital. Patient demographics, comorbidities, prior history of abdominal surgery, open vs. laparoscopic insertion, operation time, and complications within 30 days were obtained. Results Neurosurgery placed 107 shunts using an open abdominal technique and general surgery placed 78 using laparoscopy. The average OR time in minutes was 75.5 minutes for the open cohort and 61.8 for the laparoscopic cohort ( p = 0.006). In patients without a history of abdominal surgery, the average OR time in minutes was 79.4 in the open cohort and 57.1 in the laparoscopic cohort ( p = 0.015). The postoperative shunt infection rate was 10.2% in the open group and 3.8% in the laparoscopic group ( p = 0.077). Discussion Laparoscopic placement of VP shunts is a reasonable alternative to open placement and results in shorter OR times. There is also a trend toward few infections in the laparoscopic placement. There appears to be an advantage with a team approach and laparoscopic placement of the peritoneal portion of the shunt.

P163 ROLE OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH IN EMERGENT INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

Aim Analyze the evolution of the laparoscopic approach in emergent inguinal hernia repair at our center. Material and Methods Retrospective review of patients with emergent inguinal hernia repair in our center from January 2011 to June 2020. Demographic, clinical and postoperative data were analyzed as well as the evolution of the laparoscopic approach. Results 385 patients with incarcerated/strangulated inguinal hernia were registered. 58.96% were men, with a median age of 71. Of those, 22 patients (5.71%) were treated by laparoscopic approach and 363 (94.29%) by open approach. The open approach had a longer median hospitalization (4.82 vs 1.66 days), higher rate of surgical wound infection (5.51% vs. 0%), higher reoperation rate (3.31% vs 0%) and higher incidence of respiratory complications (1.97% vs 0%). 1 patient (4.54%) with laparoscopic approach required intestinal resection vs 48 patients (13.22%) of the open group, with a dehiscence rate of 0% vs 4.76% respectively. Mortality rate was 0% for the laparoscopic group and 2.75% in the open group. In the last 18 months, 28.98% of urgent hernias repaired have been performed laparoscopically, while previously from 2011 to 2017 only 0.95%, due to the learning curve obtained in elective surgery where the laparoscopic approach has had a major development in the last 3 years. Conclusions Despite the evident patient selection bias because the approach choice by the surgeon in emergent inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic approach is feasible and has lower morbidity-mortality compared to open approach in our center. In specialized centers this may be a treatment option for selected patient groups.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Ligation of Varicocele: A Study of 60 Cases

Objective: To compare the results of trans-peritoneal laparoscopic varicocelectomy with open inguinal technique in terms of operation time, post-operative pain and analgesic requirement, post-operative complications and hospital stay. Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Place & Duration of study: Department of Urology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC) Karachi, from January 2017 to December 2020. Methodology: This prospective study composed of 60 patients diagnosed as primary varicocele clinically or as asymptomatic on Doppler U/S. They were divided into two groups on the basis of type of operation by alternate methods. In Group A (n=32), laparoscopic varicocelectomy was performed while in Group B (n=28), open inguinal method was used. Their clinical presentations, operation times, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, hospital stay and postoperative complications were noted and analyzed. Results: Out of 60 patients included, the age range was from 18-30 years.41.6% patients were asymptomatic and were referred to us because they were declared unfit for recruitment. Left sided varicocele was diagnosed in 81.6% patients, while 16.6% were bilateral. Grade II was most common seen in 60% of patients. Operation time for unilateral laparoscopic varicocelectomy was 17.25±2.1minutes, while open unilateral time was 42.5±3.4 minutes. Post-operative pain and hospital stay were significantly better in laparoscopic group (p value<.001). Postoperative wound related complications and secondary hydrocele was more in open group. In laparoscopic group, subcutaneous emphysema was noted in early postoperative period in 3 patients (9.3%) and portside hernia in one patient (3.1%). Recurrence rate was more in open cases (14.2%), versus 6.2% in laparoscopic group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is a simple and safe technique causing minimal morbidity with early recovery and better surgical outcome. Keywords: Varicocele, Laparoscopic Ligation, Open ligation

Laparoscopic Castration Using Bipolar Forceps vs. Orchiectomy in Dogs: A Comparison of Two Techniques

This paper aimed to study the feasibility of a new laparoscopic castration technique in male dogs, evaluate the pain associated with it, and compare it with the classical orchiectomy. Surgical times, pain scores, blood and salivary cortisol, and CRP were recorded and compared between the two groups. The use of high-frequency bipolar forceps allowed quick and uneventful laparoscopic procedures. The laparoscopic group had significantly lower pain scores, cortisol, and PCR values than the orchiectomy group. No complications were seen in any group. Our results suggest that this laparoscopic castration is a safe and beneficial surgical alternative to traditional orchiectomy in dogs.

Introduction of advanced laparoscopy for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement and the outcome in a University Hospital

Background Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters can be obstructed by omental wrapping or migration, leading to catheter malfunction. Multiple catheter placement techniques have been described. Advanced laparoscopy with fixation of the catheter and omentum has been reported to improve functional outcome compared to basic laparoscopy without fixation. This feasibility study describes surgical technique, complications, and comparison of the functional outcome of advanced versus basic laparoscopic catheter placement. Methods Between July 2016 and April 2019, the advanced laparoscopy technique was applied in all eligible patients. Two experienced surgeons placed the catheters in a standardized procedure. Peri-operative complications and functional outcome of the catheter were scored. Results were compared to a historical cohort retrieved from our RCT performed earlier using basic laparoscopy. Findings The basic laparoscopic group (BLG) consisted of 46 patients and the advanced laparoscopic group (ALG) of 32. Complication rate in both groups was similar and low with 7% in the BLG and 6% in the ALG (p = 1.0). There was a trend toward better functional catheter outcome in the ALG (88%) compared to the BLG (70%) (p = 0.1). Part of the catheter failures in the ALG could be related to the learning curve. After revision surgery, 94% of patients in the ALG had a functional catheter. These findings lead to the set-up of a multi-center randomized-controlled trial, currently running, comparing basic to advanced laparoscopic techniques.