Three-dimensional MR angiography of a nitinol-based abdominal aortic stent graft: assessment of heating and imaging characteristics

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1775-1780 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Hilfiker ◽  
H. H. Quick ◽  
T. Pfammatter ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
J. F. Debatin
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efstratios Georgakarakos ◽  
George Trellopoulos ◽  
Chris V. Ioannou ◽  
Dimitrios Tsetis

Author(s):  
Paulo Eduardo Ocke Reis ◽  
Marcello Rotolo ◽  
Alessandra Viz Veiga ◽  
Jean Moura Netto ◽  
Vitor Nascimento Maia ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 736-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yann De Bast ◽  
Etienne Creemers

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2252-2257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Dorffner ◽  
Maria Schoder ◽  
Gerhard Mostbeck ◽  
Thomas Hölzenbein ◽  
Siegfried Thurnher ◽  
...  

Perfusion ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 521-524
Author(s):  
Ersan Tatli ◽  
Alptug Tokatli ◽  
M Bulent Vatan ◽  
Murat Aksoy ◽  
Yusuf Can ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-148
Author(s):  
H. Hyodoh

The stent-graft is a device constructed from a stent and vascular graft and is inserted by means of an interventional procedure under imaging guidance. In 1986, Balko et al.1 reported the first stentgraft experiment, in which a Z stent covered with polyurethane was inserted into an animal aorta. In the early 1990s, Parodi et al.2 reported clinical introduction of the stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm. In comparison to the abdominal aortic stent-graft, the thoracic stent-graft has several disadvantages, including difficulties associated with the aortic arch curvature and the relatively large caliber of the stent-graft, and the risk of central nervous system or spinal complication. However, the thoracic stentgraft is advantageous because of minimal procedural invasiveness in comparison to surgical graft replacement. In 1994, Dake et al.3 reported transluminal placement of an endovascular stent-graft for thoracic aortic aneurysm, and Kato et al.4 reported use of a stent-graft for aortic dissection and suggested that the stent-graft could be considered an alternative to surgical treatment.


Author(s):  
S. De Bock ◽  
F. Iannaccone ◽  
M. De Beule ◽  
F. Vermassen ◽  
P. Segers ◽  
...  

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) of the aorta is a local widening of the aorta in a region between the renal arteries and the aortic bifurcation. The disease impacts the structural integrity of the AAA wall, weakening the tissue and predisposing it to rupture. Preventive treatment of the disease is often performed minimally invasive with endovascular repair by stent graft deployment, as an alternative to open surgical repair. During endovascular aneurysm repair, a metallic stent, covered with a polymer membrane is first crimped and mounted onto the delivery system and inserted through the iliac artery. It is advanced to the AAA region, and expanded to cover the weakened, ballooning aorta. The technique has excellent clinical outcome, yet it is still associated with long term problems such as migration, a downward displacement of the device, and endoleakage, with blood reentering and pressurizing the aneurismal sack.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 801.e5-801.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludovic Canaud ◽  
Kheira Hireche ◽  
Charles Marty-Ané ◽  
Pierre Alric

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 902-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Hodgson ◽  
Richard G. McWilliams ◽  
Alistair Simpson ◽  
Derek A. Gould ◽  
John A. Brennan ◽  
...  

Purpose: To demonstrate the influence of radiographic positioning on the assessment of stent-graft migration using plain radiographs following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods: Equations were derived to correct for artifactual stent-graft migration introduced by geometric distortion due to variations in positioning between radiographs acquired at different times. A phantom system was used to validate the equations. Results: Errors in stent position increase with (1) the distance of the aortic stent-graft from the midline and (2) differences in radiographic centering points in the craniocaudal direction; other variables have little effect. For typical stent positions, errors are small if the centering changes by <8 cm. Consistent radiographic positioning to within 4 cm on successive imaging studies limits errors to 1.5 mm. Even if artifactual migration is large, the true migration can be reliably calculated to within 2 mm. Conclusions: Artifactual migration due to variation in radiographic centering is not usually clinically significant if care is taken to center radiographs consistently. Radiographs in which artifactual migration may be important are readily identified, and mathematical correction is straightforward.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document