Frankl’s Conjecture and the Dual Covering Property

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Shewale ◽  
Vinayak Joshi ◽  
V. S. Kharat
Keyword(s):  
Covering Property ◽  
Frankl’S Conjecture

scholarly journals FC-families and improved bounds for Frankl’s conjecture

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Morris
Keyword(s):  
Frankl’S Conjecture

scholarly journals The Hurewicz covering property and slaloms in the Baire space

2004 ◽  
Vol 181 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boaz Tsaban
Keyword(s):  
Baire Space ◽  
Covering Property

scholarly journals On a covering property of rarefied sets at infnity in a cone

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikuko Miyamoto ◽  
Hidenobu Yosida
Keyword(s):  
Covering Property

scholarly journals ISOCOMPACTNESS AND RELATED TOPICS OF WEAK COVERING PROPERTY

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-357
Author(s):  
Myung-Hyun Cho ◽  
Won-Woo Park
Keyword(s):  
Covering Property

Nice Hamel bases under the Covering Property Axiom

2004 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Ciesielski ◽  
Janusz Pawlikowski
Keyword(s):  
Covering Property ◽  
Covering Property Axiom

8. Theft, Handling, and Robbery

Criminal Law ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 515-574
Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Covering Property ◽  
The Law ◽  
Property Offences ◽  
Stolen Goods

This chapter begins with a discussion of the law on theft, robbery, assault with intent to rob, handling stolen goods, and money laundering offences. The second part of the chapter focuses on the theory of theft, covering property offences; the debate over Gomez; the Hinks debate; temporary appropriation; dishonesty; robberies; and handling stolen goods.

Small Coverings with Smooth Functions under the Covering Property Axiom

2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Ciesielski ◽  
Janusz Pawlikowski
Keyword(s):  
Borel Function ◽  
Covering Property ◽  
Smooth Functions ◽  
Differentiable Functions ◽  
Perfect Set ◽  
Covering Property Axiom

AbstractIn the paper we formulate a Covering Property Axiom, CPAprism, which holds in the iterated perfect set model, and show that it implies the following facts, of which (a) and (b) are the generalizations of results of J. Steprāns.(a) There exists a family ℱ of less than continuummany functions from ℝ to ℝ such that ℝ2 is covered by functions from ℱ, in the sense that for every 〈x, y〉 ∈ ℝ2 there exists an f ∈ ℱ such that either f (x) = y or f (y) = x.(b) For every Borel function f : ℝ → ℝ there exists a family ℱ of less than continuum many “” functions (i.e., differentiable functions with continuous derivatives, where derivative can be infinite) whose graphs cover the graph of f.(c) For every n > 0 and a Dn function f: ℝ → ℝ there exists a family ℱ of less than continuum many Cn functions whose graphs cover the graph of f.We also provide the examples showing that in the above properties the smoothness conditions are the best possible. Parts (b), (c), and the examples are closely related to work of A. Olevskiĭ.

Some Properties of Hyperspaces with Applications to Continua Theory

1979 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Grispolakis ◽  
Sam B. Nadler ◽  
E. D. Tymchatyn
Keyword(s):  
Covering Property ◽  
University Of Houston ◽  
Chainable Continua ◽  
The University

In 1972, Lelek introduced the notion of Class (W) in his seminar at the University of Houston [see below for definitions of concepts mentioned here]. Since then there has been much interest in classifying and characterizing continua in Class (W). For example, Cook has a result [5, Theorem 4] which implies that any hereditarily indecomposible continuum is in Class (W) Read [21, Theorem 4] showed that all chainable continua are in Class (W), and Feuerbacher proved the following result:(1.1) THEOREM [7, Theorem 7]. A non-chainable circle-like continuum is in Class (W) if and only if it is not weakly chainableIn [14, 4.2 and section 6], a covering property (denoted here and in [18] by CP) was defined and studied primarily for the purpose of proving that indecomposability is a Whitney property for the class of chainable continua [14, 4.3].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document