scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of anterior tibiofibular ligament’s distal fascicle transfer versus ligament reconstruction with InternalBrace™ for chronic ankle instability patients

Author(s):  
Jiaxin Tian ◽  
Tsz-Ngai Mok ◽  
Tat-Hang Sin ◽  
Zhengang Zha ◽  
Xiaofei Zheng ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Treatment of chronic ankle instability (CAI) for ankle sprain patients remains a challenge. If initial treatments fail, surgical stabilization techniques including ligament reconstruction should be performed. Anterior tibiofibular ligament (ATiFL) distal fascicle transfer for CAI was recently introduced. The goal of the study is to assess the 1-year clinical effectiveness of ATiFL’s distal fascicle transfer versus ligament reconstruction with InternalBrace™ (Fa. Arthrex, Naples). Methods Between October 2019 and February 2021, 25 patients (14 males and 11 females) scheduled for ligament reconstruction treatment of CAI were enrolled after propensity score matching. Twelve underwent ligament reconstruction with InternalBrace™ (InternalBrace™ group) and thirteen underwent ATiFL’s distal fascicle transfer (ATiFL’s distal fascicle transfer group). We recorded the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), anterior drawer test grade, patient satisfaction and complications. All results of this study were retrospectively analyzed. Results Statistically significant (p = 0.0251, independent-samples t test) differences in the AOFAS can be found between the ATiFL’s distal fascicle transfer group and the InternalBrace™ group. No substantial changes in the VAS (p = 0.1778, independent-samples t test), patient satisfaction (p = 0.1800, independent-samples t test) and anterior drawer test grade (p = 0.9600, independent-samples t test) were found between the two groups. There was one patient with superficial wound infection and one patient with sural nerve injury in the InternalBrace™ group and ATiFL’s distal fascicle transfer group, respectively. Conclusion This is the first study that assessed a cohort of CAI patients and suggests that the ATiFL’s distal fascicle transfer operation has the potential to attain good-to-excellent clinical outcomes after 1-year recovery. The AOFAS scores were significantly higher for patients with ATiFL’s distal fascicle transfer, indicating that this technique may be considered a viable option for both patients and their surgeon, while long-term outcomes should be investigated in the future.

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110080
Author(s):  
Sung Hyun Lee ◽  
Hyung Gyu Cho ◽  
Je Heon Yang

Background: Although several arthroscopic surgical techniques for the treatment of chronic ankle instability (CAI) have been introduced recently, the effect of inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) augmentation remains unclear. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes after arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair according to whether additional IER augmentation was performed or not. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic ATFL repair surgery for CAI between 2016 and 2018. The mean age of the patients was 35.2 years (range, 19-51 years), and the mean follow-up period was 32.6 months (range, 24-48 months). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical technique used for CAI: arthroscopic ATFL repair (group A; n = 37) and arthroscopic ATFL repair with additional IER augmentation (group R; n = 45). The pain visual analog scale, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, and the Karlsson Ankle Function Score were measured as subjective outcomes, and posturographic analysis was performed using a Tetrax device as an objective outcome. Radiologic outcome evaluations were performed preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively using stress radiographs and axial view magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Out of 101 patients, 19 (18.5%) were excluded per the exclusion criteria, and 82 were evaluated. We identified 6 retears (7.3%) based on postoperative MRI evaluation. All patients who had ATFL retear on MRI (8.1% [3/37] in group A and 6.7% [3/45] in group R) demonstrated recurrent CAI with functional discomfort and anterior displacement >3 mm as compared with the intact contralateral ankle. All clinical scores and posturography results were improved after surgery in both groups ( P < .001). However, there were no significant differences in the clinical results and radiologic findings between the groups. Conclusion: The clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with CAI improved after all-inside arthroscopic ATFL repair. However, additional IER augmentation after arthroscopic ATFL repair did not guarantee better clinical outcomes.


Foot & Ankle ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 400-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nyska ◽  
H. Amir ◽  
A. Porath ◽  
S. Dekel

Chronic ankle instability is a common complication of ankle sprain. The clinical assessment of ankle instability is usually incomplete and difficult to interpret. Recently, more attention has been paid to the value of the anterior drawer test of the ankle. We assessed the accuracy of a modification of the anterior drawer test, comparing it with radiological stress view of the ankle in 25 patients with recurrent ankle sprain. The radiological examinations were performed by a TELOS instrument and included lateral and anteroposterior stress views. We found that the modified anterior drawer test correlated with the posterior opening of the tibiotalar joint and with the lateral tilt of the talus. We conclude that a slightly positive modified anterior drawer test may indicate injury to the anterior talofibular ligament. A significant movement of the ankle elicited by the modified anterior drawer test may indicate combined injury to anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2473011416S0000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Wiewiorski ◽  
Yousef Alrashidi ◽  
Christian Stelzenbach ◽  
Mario Herrera-Perez ◽  
Alexej Barg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document