Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (7) ◽  
pp. 1400-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Bruns ◽  
Brigitte Röder
Author(s):  
Jean Vroomen ◽  
Paul Bertelson ◽  
Ilja Frissen ◽  
Beatrice De Gelder

1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172
Author(s):  
K. Terkildsen ◽  
P. Osterhammel ◽  
F. Huis in't Veld

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e0157342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyan Song ◽  
Mingyue Ding ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Xiaopeng Song ◽  
Wenliang Fan ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese C. Robier ◽  
David A. Fabry ◽  
Marjorie R. Leek ◽  
W. Van Summers

1990 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 850-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTHIAS THEOBALD ◽  
TILL HOFFMANN ◽  
DONALD BUNJES ◽  
WOLFGANG HEIT

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon A Steiner ◽  
Andrea A Kuehn ◽  
Joerg RP Geiger ◽  
Henrik Alle ◽  
Milos Popovic ◽  
...  

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) provides symptomatic relief in a growing number of neurological indications, but local synaptic dynamics in response to electrical stimulation that may relate to its mechanism of action have not been fully characterized. Objective: The objectives of this study were to (1) study local synaptic dynamics during high frequency extracellular stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), and (2) compare STN synaptic dynamics with those of the neighboring substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr). Methods: Two microelectrodes were advanced into the STN and SNr of patients undergoing DBS surgery for PD. Neuronal firing and evoked field potentials (fEPs) were recorded with one microelectrode during stimulation from an adjacent microelectrode. Results: Excitatory and inhibitory fEPs could be discerned within the STN and their amplitudes predicted bidirectional effects on neuronal firing (p = .007). There were no differences between STN and SNr inhibitory fEP dynamics at low stimulation frequencies (p > .999). However, inhibitory neuronal responses were sustained over time in STN during high frequency stimulation, but not SNr (p < .001) where depression of inhibitory input was coupled with a return of neuronal firing (p = .003). Interpretation: Persistent inhibitory input to the STN suggests a local synaptic mechanism for the suppression of subthalamic firing during high frequency stimulation. Moreover, differences in the resiliency versus vulnerability of inhibitory inputs to the STN and SNr suggest a projection source- and frequency-specificity for this mechanism. The feasibility of targeting electrophysiologically-identified neural structures may provide insight into how DBS achieves frequency-specific modulation of neuronal projections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document