scholarly journals Macroscopic Superposition States in Isolated Quantum Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman V. Buniy ◽  
Stephen D. H. Hsu
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (08) ◽  
pp. 1740013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Thomas Elze

The notion of ontological states is introduced here with reference to the Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) proposed by ’t Hooft. A class of discrete deterministic “Hamiltonian” Cellular Automata (CA) is defined that has been shown to bear many features in common with continuum quantum mechanical models, however, deformed by the presence of a finite discreteness scale [Formula: see text], such that for [Formula: see text], the usual properties result e.g. concerning linearity, dispersion relations, multipartite systems, and Superposition Principle. We argue that within this class of models, only very primitive realizations of ontological states and their dynamics can exist, since the equations of motion tend to produce superposition states that are not ontological. The most interesting, if not the only way out seems to involve interacting multipartite systems composed of two-state “Ising spins”, which evolve by a unitary transfer matrix. Thus, quantum like and ontological models appear side by side here, but distinguished by second-order and first-order dynamics, respectively.


1993 ◽  
Vol 163 (9) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.D. Agap'ev ◽  
M.B. Gornyi ◽  
B.G. Matisov ◽  
Yu.V. Rozhdestvenskii

2018 ◽  
Vol 189 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladislav Yu. Shishkov ◽  
Evgenii S. Andrianov ◽  
Aleksandr A. Pukhov ◽  
Aleksei P. Vinogradov ◽  
A.A. Lisyansky

Author(s):  
Richard Healey

Often a pair of quantum systems may be represented mathematically (by a vector) in a way each system alone cannot: the mathematical representation of the pair is said to be non-separable: Schrödinger called this feature of quantum theory entanglement. It would reflect a physical relation between a pair of systems only if a system’s mathematical representation were to describe its physical condition. Einstein and colleagues used an entangled state to argue that its quantum state does not completely describe the physical condition of a system to which it is assigned. A single physical system may be assigned a non-separable quantum state, as may a large number of systems, including electrons, photons, and ions. The GHZ state is an example of an entangled polarization state that may be assigned to three photons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document