Large eddy simulation in a fully developed turbulent flow in a channel and comparison of subgrid eddy viscosity models

2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. N. Volkov
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Viscosity Models ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Fully Developed Turbulent Flow

High-Pass Filtered Eddy-Viscosity Models for Large-Eddy Simulations of Compressible Wall-Bounded Flows

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 666-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Stolz
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Correct Prediction ◽  
Smagorinsky Model ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Viscosity Models ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
High Pass

In this contribution we consider large-eddy simulation (LES) using the high-pass filtered (HPF) Smagorinsky model of a spatially developing supersonic turbulent boundary layer at a Mach number of 2.5 and momentum-thickness Reynolds numbers at inflow of ∼4500. The HPF eddy-viscosity models employ high-pass filtered quantities instead of the full velocity field for the computation of the subgrid-scale (SGS) model terms. This approach has been proposed independently by Vreman (Vreman, A. W., 2003, Phys. Fluids, 15, pp. L61–L64) and Stolz et al. (Stolz, S., Schlatter, P., Meyer, D., and Kleiser, L., 2003, in Direct and Large Eddy Simulation V, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 81–88). Different from classical eddy-viscosity models, such as the Smagorinsky model (Smagorinsky, J., 1963, Mon. Weath. Rev, 93, pp. 99–164) or the structure-function model (Métais, O. and Lesieur, M., 1992, J. Fluid Mech., 239, pp. 157–194) which are among the most often employed SGS models for LES, the HPF eddy-viscosity models do need neither van Driest wall damping functions for a correct prediction of the viscous sublayer of wall-bounded turbulent flows nor a dynamic determination of the coefficient. Furthermore, the HPF eddy-viscosity models are formulated locally and three-dimensionally in space. For compressible flows the model is supplemented by a HPF eddy-diffusivity ansatz for the SGS heat flux in the energy equation. Turbulent inflow conditions are generated by a rescaling and recycling technique in which the mean and fluctuating part of the turbulent boundary layer at some distance downstream of inflow is rescaled and reintroduced at the inflow position (Stolz, S. and Adams, N. A., 2003, Phys. Fluids, 15, pp. 2389–2412).

Investigation of Fully Developed Turbulent Flow in a Straight Duct With Large Eddy Simulation

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Su ◽  
R. Friedrich
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Fully Developed Turbulent Flow ◽  
High Reynolds ◽  
Straight Duct

Large eddy simulations have been performed in straight ducts with square cross section at a global Reynolds number of 49,000 in order to predict the complicated mean and instantaneous flow involving turbulence-driven secondary motion. Isotropic grid systems were used with spatial resolutions of 256 * 642. The secondary flow not only turned out to develop extremely slowly from its initial conditions but also to require fairly high resolution. The obtained statistical results are compared with measurements. These results show that the large eddy simulation (LES) is a powerful approach to simulate the complex turbulence flow with high Reynolds number. Streaklines of fluid particles in the duct show the secondary flow clearly. The database obtained with LES is used to examine a statistical turbulence model and describe the turbulent vortex structure in the fully developed turbulent flow in a straight duct.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document