A simple theory of rigidity

Author(s):  
Tristan Grøtvedt Haze
Keyword(s):  
1953 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-237
Author(s):  
Robert Nordberg
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 1750001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itay Kaplan ◽  
Saharon Shelah ◽  
Pierre Simon

A theory [Formula: see text] is said to have exact saturation at a singular cardinal [Formula: see text] if it has a [Formula: see text]-saturated model which is not [Formula: see text]-saturated. We show, under some set-theoretic assumptions, that any simple theory has exact saturation. Also, an NIP theory has exact saturation if and only if it is not distal. This gives a new characterization of distality.


2011 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-641
Author(s):  
S. Rabinovich
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 103 (49) ◽  
pp. 10611-10618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruixue Xu ◽  
Jixin Cheng ◽  
Yan

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
CALUM MILLER

AbstractOne reason for thinking that theism is a relatively simple theory – and that it is thereby more likely to be true than other theories,ceteris paribus – is to insist that infinite degrees of properties are simpler than extremely large, finite degrees of properties. This defence of theism has been championed by Richard Swinburne in recent years. I outline the objections to this line of argument present in the literature, and suggest some novel resources open to Swinburne in defence. I then argue that scientists' preference for universal nomological propositions constitutes a very strong reason for supposing that theism is simpler than parodical alternatives in virtue of its positing omni-properties rather than parallel ‘mega-properties’.


Biopolymers ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 727-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. C. Johnson ◽  
I. Tinoco

2005 ◽  
Vol 123 (16) ◽  
pp. 164904 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Peroukidis ◽  
A. G. Vanakaras ◽  
D. J. Photinos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document