Alethic pluralism and the value of truth

Synthese ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Ferrari
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 368-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Ferrari ◽  
Sebastiano Moruzzi
Keyword(s):  

AbstractEcumenical Alethic Pluralism (EAP) is a novel kind of alethic pluralism. It is ecumenical in that it widens the scope of alethic pluralism by allowing for a normatively deflated truth property alongside a variety of normatively robust truth properties. We establish EAP by showing how Wright’s Inflationary Arguments fail in the domain of taste, once a relativist treatment of the metaphysics and epistemology of that domain is endorsed. EAP is highly significant to current debates on the nature of truth insofar as it involves a reconfiguration of the dialectic between deflationists and pluralists.


2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Edwards
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-178
Author(s):  
Lambert Zuidervaart

This essay lays out a reformational research program on the idea of truth. First it describes challenges to the idea of truth in contemporary philosophy and gives reasons why a robust conception of truth is needed. Next it presents two overriding concerns – ontological and axiological – that such a conception should address. In addressing these concerns, a contemporary reformational approach will take up three sets of issues: relations between propositional truth and the discursive justification of truth claims; distinctions and connections between propositional and nonpropositional truth; and the sorts of cultural practices and social institutions within which truth occurs. My detailed response to these issues, as sketched in the last section of the essay, is to propose a holistic, normative, and structurally pluralist conception of truth, one that I call holistic alethic pluralism. Propositional truth is important but not all-important, and reformational philosophy needs to show why that is so.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Filutowska

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to discuss difficulties with telling the truth in non-fictive narratives (e.g. trauma stories, rape narratives, asylum-seekers’ narratives). In order to do that I analyze, among others, various discourse fictionalization strategies, such as emplotment, narrative substances (Nss), vague predicates, and approximate references. I argue that these strategies are conditioned by the very nature of language, and therefore are present in all types of statements – literary as well as scientific. Referring to the concept of alethic pluralism, I also discuss how it is possible that the use of fictionalization techniques in non-fictive stories does not necessarily transform them into fiction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document