A half-percutaneous technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation using a modified trocar: a report of 84 cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 1451-1457
Author(s):  
Yu Peng ◽  
Difei Zhang ◽  
Tingting Zheng ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Jingxu Su ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Yip ◽  
S. L. Lui ◽  
W. K. Lo

Peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) is the lifeline of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. One of the critical issues for successful PD is a well-functioning PDC which is timely inserted. It is the implantation technique rather than the catheter design that determines the outcome of the catheter. Dedication in acquiring the appropriate technique is vital to the success of a PD program. In this paper, we discuss the pros and cons of various techniques used for PDC implantation. A detailed description of PDC implantation by using the minilaparotomy method is presented. We strongly recommend mini-laparotomy as the method of choice for PDC implantation by nephrologists.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayang Xie ◽  
Jianhui Zhou ◽  
Xueying Cao ◽  
Qingtao Zhang ◽  
Yanli Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. A large body mass index (BMI) has been considered as a relative contraindication for percutaneous catheter insertion , although this technique has many advantages. Up to now, there are few studies on peritoneal catheter placement and obesity. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with large BMI can also choose the percutaneous technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Methods. 187 consecutive patients underwent peritoneal catheter insertions in the Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016, with 178 eligible cases being included in the analysis. Two groups were created based on the catheter insertion techniques, the percutaneous group (group P) and the surgical group (group S). Subgroups were created according to BMI>28 or≤28. The outcomes included catheter related complications and catheter survival. Results. Total infectious complication rates were significantly lower in group P than in group S. The late peritonitis rates tended to be lower in group P than in group S, although the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in all other measured complications between the two groups. Though the one-year infection-free catheter survival in group P was 7.5% higher than group S, the difference was not significant. The one-year dysfunction-free catheter survival, one-year dysfunction-and-infection-free catheter survival, and overall catheter survival were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a superior one-year infection-free catheter survival of percutaneous technique in patients with BMI>28, which was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusions. Despite the challenges that may be encountered with patients who have a large BMI, the percutaneous technique is a safe and effective approach to placing a peritoneal dialysis catheter.


2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Martínez Urrutia ◽  
P. Olivares Arnal ◽  
P. López Pereira ◽  
R. Lobato Romera ◽  
A. Alonso Melgar ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 3070-3075 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Brum ◽  
A. Rodrigues ◽  
S. Rocha ◽  
M. J. Carvalho ◽  
C. Nogueira ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 502-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju-Chuan Hu ◽  
Kun-Yuan Chiu ◽  
Shian-Shiang Wang ◽  
Chuan-Su Chen ◽  
Hao-Chung Ho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document