scholarly journals How will our knowledge of short gamma-ray bursts affect the distance measurement of binary neutron stars?

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minghui Du ◽  
Lixin Xu

AbstractGravitational waves from binary neutron stars associated with short gamma-ray bursts have drawn considerable attention due to their prospect in cosmology. For such events, the sky locations of sources can be pinpointed with techniques such as identifying the host galaxies. However, the cosmological applications of these events still suffer from the problem of degeneracy between luminosity distance and inclination angle. To address this issue, a technique was proposed in previous study, i.e., using the collimation property of short gamma-ray bursts. Based on the observations, we assume that the cosine of inclination follows a Gaussian distribution, which may act as a prior in the Bayes analysis to break the degeneracy. This paper investigates the effects of different Gaussian priors and detector configurations on distance measurement and cosmological research. We first derive a simplified Fisher information matrix for demonstration, and then conduct quantitative analyses via simulation. By varying the number of third-generation detectors and the scale of prior, we generate four catalogs of 1000 events. It is shown that, in the same detecting period, a network of detectors can recognize more and farther events than a single detector. Besides, adopting tighter prior and employing multiple detectors both decrease the error of luminosity distance. Also considered is the performance of a widely adopted formula in the error budget, which turns out to be a conservative choice in each case. As for cosmological applications, for the ΛCDM model, 500, 200, 600, and 300 events are required for the four configurations to achieve 1% H0 accuracy. With all 1000 events in each catalog, H0 and Ωm can be constrained to (0.66%, 0.37%, 0.76%, 0.49%), and (0.010, 0.006, 0.013, 0.010), respectively. The results of the Gaussian process also show that the gravitational wave standard siren can serve as a probe of cosmology at high redshifts.

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 369-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. M. Lipunov ◽  
I. E. Panchenko ◽  
K. A. Postnov ◽  
M. E. Prokhorov

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju. M. Bruk ◽  
K. I. Kugel

1989 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
D. Hartmann ◽  
R.I. Epstein ◽  
S.E. Woosley

2018 ◽  
Vol 865 (2) ◽  
pp. 82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. B. Zhang ◽  
P. Chandra ◽  
Y. F. Huang ◽  
D. Li

2020 ◽  
Vol 495 (4) ◽  
pp. 4782-4799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan O’Connor ◽  
Paz Beniamini ◽  
Chryssa Kouveliotou

ABSTRACT Observational follow up of well localized short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) has left $20\!-\!30{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ of the population without a coincident host galaxy association to deep optical and NIR limits (≳26 mag). These SGRBs have been classified as observationally hostless due to their lack of strong host associations. It has been argued that these hostless SGRBs could be an indication of the large distances traversed by the binary neutron star system (due to natal kicks) between its formation and its merger (leading to an SGRB). The distances of GRBs from their host galaxies can be indirectly probed by the surrounding circumburst densities. We show that a lower limit on those densities can be obtained from early afterglow light curves. We find that ${\lesssim}16{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ of short GRBs in our sample took place at densities ≲10−4 cm−3. These densities represent the expected range of values at distances greater than the host galaxy’s virial radii. We find that out of the five SGRBs in our sample that have been found to be observationally hostless, none are consistent with having occurred beyond the virial radius of their birth galaxies. This implies one of two scenarios. Either these observationally hostless SGRBs occurred outside of the half-light radius of their host galaxy, but well within the galactic halo, or in host galaxies at moderate to high redshifts (z ≳ 2) that were missed by follow-up observations.


2002 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 1111-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Bloom ◽  
S. R. Kulkarni ◽  
S. G. Djorgovski

2012 ◽  
Vol 545 ◽  
pp. A77 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rossi ◽  
S. Klose ◽  
P. Ferrero ◽  
J. Greiner ◽  
L. A. Arnold ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document