This paper explains the reasons for reviewing translator techniques after the success of the coding/sorting trial at Luton. The merits of core matrix, magnetic drum, inductive store, and threaded-core memories are discussed. The reasons for choosing the threaded-core technique for translators are explained. Descriptions are given of the coding desk translator, the sorting machine translator, and the methods of achieving flexibility. Current assessment of the production equipments is given, and future developments, including the use of computers, are suggested.