In the work of Beidleman and Smith [On Frattini-like subgroups, Glasgow Math. J. 35 (1993) 95–98], the following question was raised: “If [Formula: see text] is a subnormal subgroup of a finite group [Formula: see text] containing [Formula: see text], then whether the supersolvability of [Formula: see text] follows the supersolvability of [Formula: see text]”. This problem was considered in works of Selkin [Maximal Subgroups in the Theory of Classes of Finite Groups (Belaruskaya, Navuka, 1997)], Skiba [On the intersection of all maximal [Formula: see text]-subgroups of a finite group, Prob. Phys. Math. Tech. 3(4) (2010) 56–62], Ballester-Bolinches [On [Formula: see text]-subnormal subgroups and Frattini-like subgroups of a finite group, Glasgow Math. J. 36 (1994) 241–247] and many other authors (see monograph [Maximal Subgroups in the Theory of Classes of Finite Groups (Belaruskaya, Navuka, 1997)]). In this paper, we give the answer to the more general question: “Let [Formula: see text] be a local formation. If [Formula: see text] is a subnormal subgroup of a group [Formula: see text], then in what case [Formula: see text] will follow from [Formula: see text]”.
On division subrings normalized by almost subnormal subgroups in division rings
