Formation of Stimulus Equivalence Relations by Exclusion: Evidence using the Blank Comparison Stimulus Procedure

Author(s):  
Elberto A. Plazas
2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 912-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asieh Abolpour Mofrad ◽  
Anis Yazidi ◽  
Hugo L. Hammer ◽  
Erik Arntzen

Stimulus equivalence (SE) and projective simulation (PS) study complex behavior, the former in human subjects and the latter in artificial agents. We apply the PS learning framework for modeling the formation of equivalence classes. For this purpose, we first modify the PS model to accommodate imitating the emergence of equivalence relations. Later, we formulate the SE formation through the matching-to-sample (MTS) procedure. The proposed version of PS model, called the equivalence projective simulation (EPS) model, is able to act within a varying action set and derive new relations without receiving feedback from the environment. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that the field of equivalence theory in behavior analysis has been linked to an artificial agent in a machine learning context. This model has many advantages over existing neural network models. Briefly, our EPS model is not a black box model, but rather a model with the capability of easy interpretation and flexibility for further modifications. To validate the model, some experimental results performed by prominent behavior analysts are simulated. The results confirm that the EPS model is able to reliably simulate and replicate the same behavior as real experiments in various settings, including formation of equivalence relations in typical participants, nonformation of equivalence relations in language-disabled children, and nodal effect in a linear series with nodal distance five. Moreover, through a hypothetical experiment, we discuss the possibility of applying EPS in further equivalence theory research.


NeuroImage ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. S288
Author(s):  
K.D. Singh ◽  
D.W. Dickins ◽  
P. Burns ◽  
J.J. Downes ◽  
P. Jimmieson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-105
Author(s):  
M.V. Samuleeva ◽  
A.A. Smirnova ◽  
Z.A. Zorina

Human language based on symbolization or sign-referent equivalence relations. The paper focuses on methods of studying the process of developing of sign-referent equivalence. Subject is trained in Matching-To-Sample task: for example, reinforcing of stimulus B if the sample was A, and stimulus D if the sample was C. Following test allows to reveal if new relations (for example, symmetry, if subject chooses stimulus A if the sample was B) appeared spontaneously. Human subjects usually pass this test successfully. This result may be explained by repeated demonstration of sign-referent symmetry during language learning and using. Our paper is dedicated to methods features which can be used to study sign-reference developing in human and animals. We discuss factors that leads to appearance of this crucial property of stimulus equivalence.


Author(s):  
Elberto A. Plazas ◽  
Deby Cortés

The hypothesis that exclusion performance is a prerequisite for the stimulus equivalence class formation was assessed in preschoolers of about 5 years of age. In Experiment 1, two groups of children were trained in a set of conditional discriminations in a two-choice matching to sample format, Group 1 in an auditory-visual modality baseline, and Group 2 in a visual-visual modality baseline. Exclusion test trials included an undefined (not previously related) comparison stimulus, and a defined (i.e., related in the baseline) comparison stimulus, in the presence of an undefined sample stimulus. Selection of the undefined comparison was recorded as a correct response. Stimulus equivalence class formation was assessed by way of symmetry and transitivity test trials. Experiment 2 replicated the design of the first experiment, with the difference that exclusion was assessed independently and with a different baseline from symmetry and transitivity. Exclusion scores were higher for the auditory-visual groups than the visual-visual groups. In both modalities symmetry scores were superior to those in transitivity. Symmetry showed independent from the exclusion performance, but transitivity was presumably dependent from it in the auditory-visual modality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-392
Author(s):  
Alna C. M. Paranhos ◽  
Carla C. P. Paracampo ◽  
Givago S. Souza ◽  
Olavo F. Galvão ◽  
Ana L. F. Brino

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-319
Author(s):  
N. A. Bazhenov ◽  
B. S. Kalmurzaev

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document