Residual Stress Analysis on Thin Metal Sheets Using the Incremental Hole Drilling Method – Fundamentals and Validation

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Magnier ◽  
W. Zinn ◽  
T. Niendorf ◽  
B. Scholtes
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Analysis ◽  
Thin Metal ◽  
Hole Drilling ◽  
Hole Drilling Method ◽  
Incremental Hole Drilling ◽  
Metal Sheets ◽  
Drilling Method ◽  
Residual Stress Analysis

scholarly journals Incremental Hole-Drilling Method Vs. Thin Components: A Simple Correction Approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 996 ◽  
pp. 283-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Held ◽  
Simone Schuster ◽  
Jens Gibmeier
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Thin Metal ◽  
Hole Drilling ◽  
Depth Profiles ◽  
Hole Drilling Method ◽  
Incremental Hole Drilling ◽  
Metal Sheets ◽  
Drilling Method ◽  
Measured Strain ◽  
The Impact

The incremental hole-drilling method is a widely used technique to determine residual stress depth profiles in technical components. Its application is limited in respect to the components geometry, for instance the components thickness. In this paper, a direct correction of the measured strain relaxations is proposed to consider the impact of deviant geometries, here the component thickness, on the residual stress evaluation that moreover, allows the application of commercially available evaluation software. The herein proposed approach is based on finite element simulation of the incremental hole drilling. The simulated strain relaxations for thin metal sheets are evaluated with an algorithm as used in commercially available evaluation software (i) for uncorrected data as well as (ii) for strain data corrected by the proposed correction procedure. It is shown that the correction approach leads to a significant improvement of the measurement accuracy. Further, by means of the approach residual stress depth profiles in thin metal sheets can be as usual determined using commercial evaluation software for the incremental hole-drilling method regardless of the algorithm used, i.e. differential or integral.

scholarly journals Comparison of Residual Stress Measurements Conducted by X-ray Stress Analysis and Incremental Hole Drilling Method

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1218-1228
Author(s):  
K. Bobzin ◽  
W. Wietheger ◽  
M. A. Knoch ◽  
A. Schacht ◽  
U. Reisgen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Analysis ◽  
Hole Drilling ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Stress Measurements ◽  
Hole Drilling Method ◽  
Incremental Hole Drilling ◽  
Drilling Method

A new calculation procedure for non-uniform residual stress analysis by the hole-drilling method

1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Petrucci ◽  
B Zuccarello
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Analysis ◽  
Calculation Procedure ◽  
Hole Drilling ◽  
Calculation Methods ◽  
Mechanical Parts ◽  
Hole Drilling Method ◽  
Drilling Method ◽  
Residual Stress Analysis ◽  
Calculation Procedures

The hole-drilling method is one of the most used semi-destructive techniques for residual stress analysis in mechanical parts. In the presence of non-uniform residual stress, the stress field can be determined from the measured relaxed strains using several calculation methods, but the most used one is the so-called integral method. This method is characterized by some simplifications that lead to approximate results, especially when the residual stress varies abruptly. In this paper a new calculation procedure called the spline methods is proposed, which allows these drawbacks to be overcome. Numerical simulations and an experimental test have corroborated the best performance of the proposed technique with respect to the calculation procedures used at present.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document