Epistemic entrenchment and arithmetical hierarchy

1994 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Petr Hájek
2018 ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Shoenfield

2017 ◽  
pp. 126-133
Author(s):  
Mehdi Ghasemi ◽  
Mojtaba Moniri

2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 1078-1082
Author(s):  
Carl G. Jockusch ◽  
Tamara J. Lakins

AbstractFor X ⊆ ω, let [X]n denote the class of all n-element subsets of X. An infinite set A ⊆ ω is called n-r-cohesive if for each computable function f: [ω]n → {0, 1} there is a finite set F such that f is constant on [A − F]n. We show that for each n > 2 there is no Πn0 set A ⊆ ω which is n-r-cohesive. For n = 2 this refutes a result previously claimed by the authors, and for n ≥ 3 it answers a question raised by the authors.


1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-688
Author(s):  
Henry A. Kierstead

If σ is the order type of a recursive linear order which has a nontrivial automorphism, we let denote the least complexity in the arithmetical hierarchy such that every recursive order of type σ has a nontrivial automorphism of complexity . In Chapter 16 of his book Linear orderings [R], Rosenstein discussed the problem of determining for certain order types σ. For example Rosenstein proved that , where ζ is the order type of the integers, by constructing a recursive linear order of type ζ which has no nontrivial Σ1-automorphism and showing that every recursive linear order of type ζ has a nontrivial Π1-automorphism. Rosenstein also considered linear orders of order type 2 · η, where 2 is the order type of a two-element chain and η is the order type of the rational numbers. It is easily seen that any recursive linear order of type 2 · η has a nontrivial ⊿2-automorphism; he showed that there is a recursive linear order of type 2 · η that has no nontrivial Σ1-automorphism. This left the question, posed in [R] and also by Lerman and Rosenstein in [LR], of whether or ⊿2. The main result of this article is that :


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document