Context effects in lexical processing

Cognition ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 25 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 213-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Tanenhaus ◽  
Margery M. Lucas
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Eisenhauer ◽  
Christian J. Fiebach ◽  
Benjamin Gagl

AbstractWord familiarity and predictive context facilitate visual word processing, leading to faster recognition times and reduced neuronal responses. Previously, models with and without top-down connections, including lexical-semantic, pre-lexical (e.g., orthographic/ phonological), and visual processing levels were successful in accounting for these facilitation effects. Here we systematically assessed context-based facilitation with a repetition priming task and explicitly dissociated pre-lexical and lexical processing levels using a pseudoword familiarization procedure. Experiment 1 investigated the temporal dynamics of neuronal facilitation effects with magnetoencephalography (MEG; N=38 human participants) while Experiment 2 assessed behavioral facilitation effects (N=24 human participants). Across all stimulus conditions, MEG demonstrated context-based facilitation across multiple time windows starting at 100 ms, in occipital brain areas. This finding indicates context based-facilitation at an early visual processing level. In both experiments, we furthermore found an interaction of context and lexical familiarity, such that stimuli with associated meaning showed the strongest context-dependent facilitation in brain activation and behavior. Using MEG, this facilitation effect could be localized to the left anterior temporal lobe at around 400 ms, indicating within-level (i.e., exclusively lexical-semantic) facilitation but no top-down effects on earlier processing stages. Increased pre-lexical familiarity (in pseudowords familiarized utilizing training) did not enhance or reduce context effects significantly. We conclude that context based-facilitation is achieved within visual and lexical processing levels. Finally, by testing alternative hypotheses derived from mechanistic accounts of repetition suppression, we suggest that the facilitatory context effects found here are implemented using a predictive coding mechanism.Significance StatementThe goal of reading is to derive meaning from script. This highly automatized process benefits from facilitation depending on word familiarity and text context. Facilitation might occur exclusively within each level of word processing (i.e., visual, pre-lexical, and/or lexical-semantic) but could alternatively also propagate in a top-down manner from higher to lower levels. To test the relevance of these two alternative accounts at each processing level, we combined a pseudoword learning approach controlling for letter string familiarity with repetition priming. We found enhanced context-based facilitation at the lexical-semantic but not pre-lexical processing stage, and no evidence of top-down facilitation from lexical-semantic to earlier word recognition processes. We also identified predictive coding as the most likely mechanism underlying within-level context-based facilitation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1567-1586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Aristei ◽  
Alissa Melinger ◽  
Rasha Abdel Rahman

In this study, we investigated semantic context effects in language production with event-related brain potentials, extracted from the ongoing EEG recorded during overt speech production. We combined the picture–word interference paradigm and the semantic blocking paradigm to investigate the temporal dynamics and functional loci of semantic facilitation and interference effects. Objects were named in the context of semantically homogeneous blocks consisting of related objects and heterogeneous blocks consisting of unrelated objects. In each blocking condition, semantically related and unrelated distractor words were presented. Results show that classic patterns of semantically induced facilitation and interference effects in RTs can be directly related to ERP modulations located at temporal and frontal sites, starting at about 200 msec. Results also suggest that the processes associated with semantic facilitation and interference effects (i.e., conceptual and lexical processing) are highly interactive and coincide in time. Implications for the use of event-related brain potentials in speech production research and implications for current models of speech production are discussed.


Author(s):  
Kristin Lemhöfer ◽  
Ralph Radach

To investigate the language-specific or language-integrated nature of bilingual lexical processing in different task contexts, we studied how bilinguals process nonwords that differ in their relative resemblance to the bilinguals’ two languages in different versions of the lexical decision task. Unbalanced German-English bilinguals performed a pure-German, a pure-English, and a mixed lexical decision task on the same set of nonwords that were either very English-like or very German-like. Rejection latencies for these two nonword categories were reversed in the pure-English and pure-German conditions: Nonwords that were more similar to the current target language were rejected more slowly. In the mixed task, reaction times were generally slower, and nonwords resembling the participants’ subdominant language (English) were harder to reject. The results suggest that task context substantially alters the criteria for the word/nonword decision in bilinguals.


Author(s):  
Claude G. Čech ◽  
Edward J. Shoben
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document