EEG asymmetry as a function of occupation, task, and task difficulty

1975 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Dumas ◽  
Arlene Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Task Difficulty ◽  
Eeg Asymmetry ◽  
And Task

Goal Orientation, Task Interest, and Task Difficulty: An HLM Analysis

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Horvath ◽  
Hailey L. Ahlfinger ◽  
Robert L. McKie
Keyword(s):  
Goal Orientation ◽  
Task Difficulty ◽  
Orientation Task ◽  
Task Interest ◽  
And Task

Effect of tonal noise and task difficulty on electroencephalography and cognitive performance

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Marzieh Sadeghian ◽  
Saeid Yazdanirad ◽  
Seyed Mahdi Mousavi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Jafari ◽  
Ali Khavanin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Task Difficulty ◽  
Tonal Noise ◽  
And Task

Effects of state anxiety and task difficulty on computer-assisted learning.

1969 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 343-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold F. O'Neil ◽  
Charles D. Spielberger ◽  
Duncan N. Hansen
Keyword(s):  
State Anxiety ◽  
Task Difficulty ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Learning ◽  
And Task

scholarly journals Goals and task difficulty expectations modulate striatal responses to feedback

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 610-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha DePasque Swanson ◽  
Elizabeth Tricomi
Keyword(s):  
Task Difficulty ◽  
And Task

The Effect of Processing Code, Response Modality and Task Difficulty on Dual Task Performance and Subjective Workload in a Manual System

1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 847-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yili Liu ◽  
Christopher D. Wickens
Keyword(s):  
Task Performance ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Task Difficulty ◽  
Task Structure ◽  
Time Sharing ◽  
Multiple Resources ◽  
Response Modality ◽  
Dual Task Performance ◽  
Processing Resources ◽  
And Task

We report here the first experiment of a series studying the effect of task structure and difficulty demand on time-sharing performance and workload in both automated and corresponding manual systems. The experimental task involves manual control time-shared with spatial and verbal decisions tasks of two levels of difficulty and two modes of response (voice or manual). The results provide strong evidence that tasks and processes competing for common processing resources are time shared less effectively and have higher workload than tasks competing for separate resources. Subjective measures and the structure of multiple resources are used in conjunction to predict dual task performance. The evidence comes from both single task and from dual task performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document