Laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube insertion by unskilled personnel

The Lancet ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 336 (8721) ◽  
pp. 977-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.R.F. Davies ◽  
S.Q.M. Tighe ◽  
G.L. Greenslade ◽  
G.H. Evans
1991 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
P. R. F. DAVIES ◽  
S. Q. M. TIGHE ◽  
G. L. GREENSLADE ◽  
G. H. EVANS

1991 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
P. R. F. Davies ◽  
S. Q. M. Tighe ◽  
G. L. Greenslade ◽  
G. H. Evans

AbstractAfter a short training programme 11 naval medical trainees inserted a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and a tracheal tube (ETT) in random order in a total of 110 anaesthetized patients. They were allowed 40 seconds for each attempt. Success was defined as the detection of expired carbon dioxide within 40 seconds of Guedel airway removal which subsequently rose to an end-tidal value of at least 4 kPa, together with satisfactory lung expansion and ventilation, without other airway intervention by the anaesthetist. One hundred and four LMA insertions were successful compared with 56 ETTs (p<0.01). All first attempts at LMA insertion were successful, whereas satisfactory ETT placement was progressive. Insertion was also quicker with the LMA (20 seconds) than with the ETT (35 seconds) (p<0.01). Further studies are indicated to assess the value of the LMA in emergencies.


1997 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girish P. Joshi ◽  
Yoshimi Inagaki ◽  
Paul F. White ◽  
Lisa Taylor-Kennedy ◽  
Linda I. Wat ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-23
Author(s):  
Savita Saini ◽  
Naresh ◽  
Sarla Hooda ◽  
Nandini

Anaesthesia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Asai ◽  
K. Murao ◽  
K. Shingu

1992 ◽  
Vol 77 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. A1175
Author(s):  
M. F. Watcha ◽  
P. F. White ◽  
L. Tyschen ◽  
J. L. Stevens

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Howath ◽  
J. Brimacombe ◽  
C. Keller

We determined the success rates, cardiovascular responses and airway morbidity for gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway. One hundred anaesthetized, non-paralyzed adults (ASA 1–2, aged 18 to 80 years) were studied. The ProSeal LMA drainage tube was primed with a well-lubricated 16 French gauge gum-elastic bougie with the curved end proximal and the straight end protruding 30 cm beyond the drainage tube tip. The straight end of the gum-elastic bougie was inserted into the oesophagus under laryngoscopic guidance, the laryngoscope removed and the ProSeal LMA inserted using the standard insertion technique and the gum-elastic bougie as a guide. The following variables were recorded: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, ventilatory capability, ease of gastric tube insertion, blood staining on the bougie or LMA at removal, and postoperative airway morbidity. Haemodynamic data were recorded immediately pre-insertion and every minute for five minutes after insertion. Gum-elastic bougie and ProSeal LMA insertion was successful at the first attempt in all patients within 50 seconds. There were no significant increases in heart rate or blood pressure. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was 33 (17–40) cmH 2 O and ventilation was possible without leak in all patients at 9.5 ml.kg –1 tidal volume. There were no drainage tube or gastric air leaks. Gastric tube insertion was successful at the first attempt in all patients. Blood staining at removal was not detected on the gum-elastic bougie, but was detected in 3% of ProSeal LMAs. The incidence of sore throat, dysphagia and dysarthria was 21%, 9% and 1% respectively. We conclude that gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal LMA has a high success rate and is associated with minimal haemodynamic change and a low incidence of trauma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document