Differential conditioning of electrodermal responses: Effects of performing a masking task during the interstimulus and intertrial intervals

1974 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Wilson ◽  
Marcus J. Fuhrer ◽  
Paul E. Baer
2002 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonifacio Sandin ◽  
Paloma Chorot

In the present study we examined Eysenck's incubation hypothesis of fear. Probability of skin conductance response (SCR) was analyzed for a sample of 79 undergraduate women, ranging in age from 18 to 25 years. Different groups of participants were conditioned to two levels of unconditioned stimuli (UCS) intensity and presented to three levels of unreinforced conditioned stimuli (CS) exposures (extinction phase) in a delay differential conditioning paradigm. The CSs were fear-relevant slides (snakes and spiders) and the UCSs were aversive tones. Analysis did not show a clear incubation effect; instead an increased resistance to extinction of SCR probability in association to the high-UCS and the short unreinforced CS presentation was evident. Findings support partially Eysenck's incubation theory of fear/anxiety.


1965 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-347
Author(s):  
Robert Goldstein ◽  
Benjamin RosenblÜt

Electrodermal and electroencephalic responsivity to sound and to light was studied in 96 normal-hearing adults in three separate sessions. The subjects were subdivided into equal groups of white men, white women, colored men, and colored women. A 1 000 cps pure tone was the conditioned stimulus in two sessions and white light was used in a third session. Heat was the unconditioned stimulus in all sessions. Previously, an inverse relation had been found in white men between the prominence of alpha rhythm in the EEG and the ease with which electrodermal responses could be elicited. This relation did not hold true for white women. The main purpose of the present study was to answer the following questions: (1) are the previous findings on white subjects applicable to colored subjects? (2) are subjects who are most (or least) responsive electrophysiologically on one day equally responsive (or unresponsive) on another day? and (3) are subjects who are most (or least) responsive to sound equally responsive (or unresponsive) to light? In general, each question was answered affirmatively. Other factors influencing responsivity were also studied.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah R. Zinner ◽  
Eddie Harmon-Jones ◽  
Patricia G. Devine ◽  
David M. Amodio

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Lanatà ◽  
Gaetano Valenza ◽  
E.Pasquale Scilingo

1936 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-39
Author(s):  
D. Ulrich Greenwald

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document