CONSTRUCTING OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS AND THE COMPLEXITY OF THE POLICY DESIGN PROCESS

Author(s):  
B. Rustem ◽  
K. Velupillai
1995 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. Westaway

This note examines the role of macroeconomic models in the policy design process. It discusses some of the general issues that need to be addressed if macroeconomic models are to make an important contribution to the policy debate. More topically, it illustrates the role that can be played by using policy optimisation techniques on the National Institute UK model to examine some of the macroeconomic policy options currently facing policymakers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonore Haelg ◽  
Sebastian Sewerin ◽  
Tobias S. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jamie McIntosh ◽  
Richard MacPherson ◽  
Grant Ingram ◽  
Simon Hogg

Profiled endwalls are a widely researched technology for reducing the secondary loss in turbines. Most designs in the literature have been produced directly by manufacturers and although general performance information is given the detailed design decisions are kept confidential. This paper outlines a simple design system for profiled endwalls that uses genetic algorithms to find an acceptable design. As the design process is produced in an academic environment full details of the design process, geometries produced, objective functions and the various trade-offs involved in the design are available and discussed in the paper. Two designs were produced using the design system: one using secondary kinetic energy as the objective function of the design system and the second using a U-cubed integral. The different designs that are produced with the different objective functions are discussed in detail in the paper. Finally profiled endwalls have traditionally been used in the high pressure stages of gas turbine blades, the paper also discusses the merits and challenges in applying these technologies to the high pressure and intermediate pressure stages of steam turbines.


2021 ◽  
pp. 426-444
Author(s):  
Stelian Brad

AbstractDesign for Excellence (DfEx) is the name given to an engineering process where a product is designed to meet a set of objective functions that cover its lifecycle. There are negative correlations between different objective functions in this set and issues related to technological complexity are added, since modern products typically fall into the category of smart connected mechatronic products. This context leads to complexity in terms of tackling the design process. Simultaneous engineering and PLM platforms can only partially handle such levels of complexity. To our knowledge, the subject of DfEx was treated in current researches from a limited perspective, which does not necessarily cover the complexity of the present-day context. In order to formulate a reliable DfEx framework, this research considers a strategy based on tools that manage in a systematic way the process of identifying the comprehensive set of barriers and conflicts that obstruct DfEx. This research highlights the level of complexity in setting up a reliable methodology to DfEx of modern, sophisticated mechatronic products. A set of guidelines to be placed at the foundation of an effective DfEx methodology is formulated with the support of TRIZ.


Author(s):  
Yutaka Nomaguchi ◽  
Ryousuke Matsuyasu ◽  
Takahiro Horinouchi ◽  
Kikuo Fujita

The importance of flexible and optimal planning of engineering design process for ensuring business success is increasingly recognized in today’s competitive environment. Because a product consists of a lot of subsystems each of which has technical functionalities, an engineering design process consists of two different activities, i.e., an activity to enhance the technical performance level of each subsystem, and an activity to enhance the integrity among the subsystems. When considering the limitation of resources that a manufacturer possesses, there is a trade-off between the achievement probabilities of those activities, although they correlate with each other. This paper proposes a new optimization method of design process planning that aims at a Pareto-optimal achievement of individual technical performances and total product integrity in order to support decision makings of a project manager. A planning of design process is a very complicated optimization problem including a number of various design variables and various evaluation indices. Some of those are discrete factors, while the others are continuous. In order to solve such a complicated problem with a reasonable computation cost, this research separates the optimization problem into two sub problems, i.e., (i) defining of process architecture and organization structure, that is, definition of activities, their sequences, and task groups and (ii) scheduling of resource allocation into activities. A growth curve model with a fuzzy number, which we have been developing, is used to formulate objective functions that evaluate the achievement probability of technical performance and its total integrity. The same model is adopted for objective functions of both sub problems so as to keep consistency between their optimization results. Neighborhood Cultivation GA (NCGA) is adopted in order to effectively solve the multi-objective optimization problem. This paper demonstrates its application to a student design project in order to show the ability of the method. A proposed optimization method facilitates a project manager to explore various process plans, to assess their risks, and decide a temporary plan.


Author(s):  
Huib Pellikaan ◽  
Robert J. van der Veen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document