The Role of Registration and Representation in Facial Affect Analysis

Author(s):  
Evangelos Sariyanidi ◽  
Hatice Gunes ◽  
Andrea Cavallaro
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 526-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella Tsotsi ◽  
Vassilis P. Bozikas ◽  
Mary H. Kosmidis

2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 856-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Claypool ◽  
Kurt Hugenberg ◽  
Meghan K. Housley ◽  
Diane M. Mackie
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Vol 68 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1095-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
William George McCown ◽  
Alan Dewolfe ◽  
John Shack ◽  
Richard Maier

Previous research regarding recognition of facial affect and personality variables has produced apparently contradictory findings. One reason for these inconsistencies may be varieties of experimental methods employed by different researchers. To investigate this possibility, the relation between three personality variables, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism, and accuracy in recognition of facial affect was examined with three methods of stimulus presentation: slide presentation, photographic display, and tachistoscopic administration. The nontachistoscopic methods correlated moderately and positively. Extraversion correlated positively with the ability to recognize facial expression with the nontachistoscopic methods. Psychoticism correlated negatively with correct affect recognition, although only for tachistoscopic presentation. Neuroticism did not correlate with recognition of facial affect using any of the methods. Possible explanations and limitations are discussed.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document