Sustainability assessment of bioleaching for mineral resource recovery from MSWI ashes

2022 ◽  
pp. 419-445
Author(s):  
Valerio Funari
2018 ◽  
Vol 612 ◽  
pp. 613-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Millward-Hopkins ◽  
Jonathan Busch ◽  
Phil Purnell ◽  
Oliver Zwirner ◽  
Costas A. Velis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 266 ◽  
pp. 121854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Silk ◽  
Beatrice Mazzali ◽  
Carina L. Gargalo ◽  
Manuel Pinelo ◽  
Isuru A Udugama ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ries ◽  
M. Trotz ◽  
K. Vairavamoorthy

The theoretical framework presented in this paper proposes a method for determining which practices will inform a set of key indicators provide a ‘snapshot’ sustainability assessment of U.S. urban water utilities. It describes the method used to gather data via two qualitative research approaches to inform a sustainability index: semi-structured interviews with an external advisory committee of 12 U.S. urban water utility leaders, and online surveys of water professionals using the freelisting technique. The utility leader interviews revealed public education and communication as the most frequently cited sustainable practice, followed by asset management, community return on infrastructure investment, financial management, green infrastructure, and resource recovery practices. The water professionals survey revealed resource recovery as the most frequently cited sustainable practice, followed by water conservation, asset management and financial management, and energy efficiency. A consensus did not emerge about what is needed to drive more widespread adoption of sustainability indictors. The most frequently cited barriers to more widespread adoption were the absence of a definition of sustainability, lack of incentives, and resource requirements.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 100030
Author(s):  
Solveig L. Johannesdottir ◽  
Erik Kärrman ◽  
Karina Barquet ◽  
Jari Koskiaho ◽  
Olle Olsson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 04020181
Author(s):  
Alena J. Raymond ◽  
Alissa Kendall ◽  
Jason T. DeJong ◽  
Edward Kavazanjian ◽  
Miriam A. Woolley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 142-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yusupova ◽  
S. Khalimova

The paper deals with the research devoted to characteristics of high tech business development in Russia. Companies’ performance indicators have been analyzed with the help of regression analysis and author’s scheme of leadership stability and sustainability assessment. Data provided by Russia’s Fast Growing High-Tech Companies’ National Rating (TechUp) during 2012-2016 were used. The results have revealed that the high tech sector is characterized by high level of uncertainty. Limited number of regions and sectors which form the basis for high tech business have been defined. Relationship between innovation activity’s indicators and export potential is determined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document