Extensor Tendon Injuries

Author(s):  
Krishna Rao ◽  
Gregory Mccarten
2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. BRÜNER ◽  
M. WITTEMANN ◽  
A. JESTER ◽  
K. BLUMENTHAL ◽  
G. GERMANN

This retrospective study evaluates a dynamic active motion protocol for extensor tendon repairs in zones V to VII. Fifty-eight patients with 87 extensor tendon injuries were examined. Using Geldmacher’s and Kleinert and Verdan’s evaluation systems, the results were graded as “excellent” and “good” in more than 94%, and as “satisfactory” in the remainder. The need for secondary tenolysis was low (6%), and no other surgical complication occurred.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
AmrA.A Abdella ◽  
MohamedA Quolquela ◽  
ElsayedM Elfors ◽  
MohamedS Saeid

1978 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
L. K. Pretorius

No abstract available.


1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Blair ◽  
Curtis M. Steyers

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (02) ◽  
pp. 203-215
Author(s):  
Andrea B. Rosskopf ◽  
Mihra S. Taljanovic ◽  
Luca M. Sconfienza ◽  
Salvatore Gitto ◽  
Carlo Martinoli ◽  
...  

AbstractTendon injuries represent the second most common injury of the hand (after fractures) and are a common scanning indication in radiology. Pulley injuries are very frequent in rock climbers with the A2 pulley the most commonly affected. Tendon and pulley injuries can be reliably evaluated using ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). US can be postulated as a first-line imaging modality, allowing dynamic examination. MRI is essential for cases with ongoing diagnostic doubt post-US and also for preoperative pulley reconstruction assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document