Neural Mechanisms of Natural Scene Perception

Author(s):  
J.L. Gallant ◽  
R.J. Prenger
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Duchesne ◽  
Vincent Bouvier ◽  
Julien Guillemé ◽  
Olivier A. Coubard

When we explore a visual scene, our eyes make saccades to jump rapidly from one area to another and fixate regions of interest to extract useful information. While the role of fixation eye movements in vision has been widely studied, their random nature has been a hitherto neglected issue. Here we conducted two experiments to examine the Maxwellian nature of eye movements during fixation. In Experiment 1, eight participants were asked to perform free viewing of natural scenes displayed on a computer screen while their eye movements were recorded. For each participant, the probability density function (PDF) of eye movement amplitude during fixation obeyed the law established by Maxwell for describing molecule velocity in gas. Only the mean amplitude of eye movements varied with expertise, which was lower in experts than novice participants. In Experiment 2, two participants underwent fixed time, free viewing of natural scenes and of their scrambled version while their eye movements were recorded. Again, the PDF of eye movement amplitude during fixation obeyed Maxwell’s law for each participant and for each scene condition (normal or scrambled). The results suggest that eye fixation during natural scene perception describes a random motion regardless of top-down or of bottom-up processes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 30-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Díaz-Pernas ◽  
Mario Martínez-Zarzuela ◽  
Míriam Antón-Rodríguez ◽  
David González-Ortega

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1165-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Cohen ◽  
George A. Alvarez ◽  
Ken Nakayama

2008 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
Olivier A. Coubard ◽  
Céline Perez ◽  
Seta Kazandjian ◽  
Sylvie Chokron

Nature ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 460 (7251) ◽  
pp. 94-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius V. Peelen ◽  
Li Fei-Fei ◽  
Sabine Kastner

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent van de Ven ◽  
Bert Jans ◽  
Rainer Goebel ◽  
Peter De Weerd

Visual scene perception owes greatly to surface features such as color and brightness. Yet, early visual cortical areas predominantly encode surface boundaries rather than surface interiors. Whether human early visual cortex may nevertheless carry a small signal relevant for surface perception is a topic of debate. We induced brightness changes in a physically constant surface by temporally modulating the luminance of surrounding surfaces in seven human participants. We found that fMRI activity in the V2 representation of the constant surface was in antiphase to luminance changes of surrounding surfaces (i.e., activity was in-phase with perceived brightness changes). Moreover, the amplitude of the antiphase fMRI activity in V2 predicted the strength of illusory brightness perception. We interpret our findings as evidence for a surface-related signal in early visual cortex and discuss the neural mechanisms that may underlie that signal in concurrence with its possible interaction with the properties of the fMRI signal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document