Leonard Dickson, History of the theory of numbers (1919–1923)

Author(s):  
Della D. Fenster
Keyword(s):  
1923 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 257-265
Author(s):  
R. D. Carmichael

The larger portion of the theorems in Diophantine Analysis probably existed first as empirical or conjectural theorems. Many of them passed to the state of proved theorems before they left the hands of those who discovered them; many others were proved in the same generation in which they were made public; not a few required a longer period for their proof; and several remain today as a silent challenge to the skill and power of contemporary mathematicians. The remarks may be illustrated with a brief account of the history of the problem of representing numbers (that is, positive integers) as sums of squares of integers and of higher powers. Anyone interested in further details will find them in the comprehensive account of Diophantine Analysis which fills volume II (xxvi + 803 pages) of L. E. Dickson's “History of the Theory of Numbers,” Carnegie Institution, Washington, D. C. We shall make free use of the material summarized in a masterly way in this volume.


Nature ◽  
1923 ◽  
Vol 111 (2775) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
W. E. H. B.
Keyword(s):  

1970 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 446-448
Author(s):  
Richard R. Eakin

This book is the first volume in a new series on the history of science, and is a clearly written, historically oriented introduction to the theory of numbers. It is written in a witty style especially suitable for high school students, and encourages its readers to think about numbers in an adventuresome, exploratory manner.


1958 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 165-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Wasserstein

This famous passage has given rise to much discussion and some perplexity. Theodoras the mathematician is represented by Theaetetus as proving the irrationality of the square roots of the (non-square) numbers from 3 to 17:‘He took the separate cases up to the root of 17 square feet; and there, for some reason, he stopped.’ (Transl. Cornford.)The passage is of great importance in the history of Greek mathematics for more than one reason. Theaetetus is said to have generalized the proof of the irrationality of square roots of non-square integers; and thus his connexion with this passage is important because Plato here obviously implies that Theodorus was not giving a generalized proof—otherwise, why should he go up to 17 ? If Theodorus did not know the generalized proof, he clearly had to proceed by enumeration and proof of particular case


Nature ◽  
1919 ◽  
Vol 104 (2601) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document