Opportunities for mitigating bias in the process and priorities for pediatric chief resident selection

Author(s):  
Sarah Gustafson ◽  
Patricia Poitevien ◽  
Rhonda Acholonu ◽  
Rebecca Blankenburg ◽  
H. Barrett Fromme
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-446
Author(s):  
Elaine R. Cohen ◽  
Joshua L. Goldstein ◽  
Clara J. Schroedl ◽  
Nancy Parlapiano ◽  
William C. McGaghie ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background The US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores are often used to inform a variety of secondary medical career decisions, such as residency selection, despite the lack of validity evidence supporting their use in these contexts. Objective We compared USMLE scores between non–chief residents (non-CRs) and chief residents (CRs), selected based on performance during training, at a US academic medical center that sponsors a variety of graduate medical education programs. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of residents' USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores from 2015 to 2020. The authors used archived data to compare USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores between non-CR residents in each of the eligible programs and their CRs during the 6-year study period. Results Thirteen programs enrolled a total of 1334 non-CRs and 211 CRs over the study period. There were no significant differences overall between non-CRs and CRs average USMLE Step 1 (239.81 ± 14.35 versus 240.86 ± 14.31; P = .32) or Step 2 scores (251.06 ± 13.80 versus 252.51 ± 14.21; P = .16). Conclusions There was no link between USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores and CR selection across multiple clinical specialties over a 6-year period. Reliance on USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores to predict success in residency as measured by CR selection is not recommended.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. e41
Author(s):  
Sarah Gustafson ◽  
Patricia Poitevien ◽  
Rhonda Acholonu ◽  
Rebecca Blankenburg ◽  
H. Barrett Fromme

Author(s):  
K Farrell ◽  
LE Walker ◽  
N Battaglioli ◽  
HA Heaton ◽  
C Lohse ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 238212052093077
Author(s):  
Nikisha Q Richards ◽  
Reginald K Osardu

Purpose: Investigate whether number of logged Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical cases correlates with likelihood of Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) ophthalmology residents being selected as the chief resident. Design: Retrospective study. Participants: VCUHS ophthalmology residents from 2006 to 2016. Methods: Analyze association between chief resident selection and logged cases. Main outcome measures: Review number of archived logged ACGME surgical cases of all residents between the years 2006 and 2017. Review chief resident selected each year 2006-2016. Results: Our analysis correctly predicted the chief resident in 2 of the 10 years analyzed. Conclusion: Those residents performing the most surgical procedures in each respective class were not more likely to be selected as chief resident.


2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S95-S96
Author(s):  
R Demkowicz ◽  
S Sapatnekar ◽  
D Chute

Abstract Introduction/Objective Since the start of the new millennium, optimization of Quality and Patient Safety (QPS) has taken a renewed focus in the healthcare industry. Consequently, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has mandated that QPS be a part of residency training. We have previously presented our curriculum designed to meet the specific needs of Pathology training programs, and covering four content areas: Handoffs, Error Management, Laboratory Administration, and Process Improvement. We are now presenting implementation. Methods To implement this curriculum, we 1) created online modules for self-directed learning on basic topics (using courses developed by IHI and CAP, and assigned articles), and paired these with faculty-facilitated interactive learning activities on more complex topics, including proficiency testing, root cause analysis and test utilization, 2) assigned every resident to a QPS project that was aligned with departmental priorities, led by a faculty advisor, and ran over 8- 10 months, and 3) appointed a QPS Chief Resident to coordinate and support the residents’ QPS activities. We measured the impact of the curriculum by comparing RISE laboratory accreditation percentiles and QPS curriculum quiz scores before and after curriculum implementation. Results After its implementation, RISE percentiles increased by at least 25 for every PGY, and QPS quiz scores increased by at least 10% for 3 of 4 PGY. Every QPS project was presented at Grand Rounds, and 4 were presented externally, including 2 at national conferences. Conclusion Our curriculum was successful in improving residents’ knowledge and competence in QPS. Challenges included designing appropriate learning activities, tracking completion of activities, coordinating faculty schedules and maintaining resident buy-in to the curriculum. We believe that the basic structure of our curriculum offers a solid foundation to which revisions can be made as QPS priorities evolve, and which can be readily adapted to other programs and locations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 143 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P40-P40
Author(s):  
John Bent ◽  
Patrick Colley ◽  
Gerald Zahtz ◽  
Richard Smith ◽  
Marvin Fried
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document