Peer review report 1 On “The impact of changes in the timing of precipitation on the herbaceous understorey of Mediterranean oak woodlands”

2015 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Philip Fay
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Oak Woodlands ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mediterranean Oak Woodlands

The impact of peer review on professional practice.

1984 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 406-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton Theaman
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Professional Practice ◽  
The Impact

PD-0051: The impact of neuroradiology collaboration in head and neck cancer radiotherapy peer review

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S19
Author(s):  
R. Jadon ◽  
R. Benson ◽  
T. Das ◽  
G. Barnett
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals The Impact of Transitioning to Prospective Contouring and Planning Rounds as Peer Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 532-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Surucu ◽  
Amishi Bajaj ◽  
John C. Roeske ◽  
Alec M. Block ◽  
Jennifer Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
The Impact

Editorial | Stop the Academic Bullying: Our Internal Reflections for a Fairer Peer Reviews [Hentikan Perundungan Akademik: Refleksi Internal untuk Penilaian Sejawat yang Lebih Adil]

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Adrianta Surijah
Keyword(s):  
Career Development ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Editorial Note ◽  
Peer Reviews ◽  
Academic Bullying ◽  
New Guidelines ◽  
The Impact

Academic bullying in peer reviews is a cultural problem. This Editorial Note is intended to identify the unhelpful comments/critiques and to highlight the impact of unprofessional peer reviews toward the well-being and career development of fellow researchers. We acknowledge that we are part of the problems, and the necessary steps are needed to break the chain of the academic bullying culture in peer reviews. New guidelines for editors and reviewers are part of the solutions to promote constructive comments, as well as stronger internal consolidation throughout the peer reviews process.   Perundungan akademik dalam penilaian sejawat (peer review) adalah sebuah permasalahan kultur. Catatan Editorial ini bertujuan mengindentifikasi komentar atau kritik yang tidak membangun, serta menggarisbawahi dampak penilaian sejawat yang tidak profesional terhadap kesejahteraan dan pengembangan karir sesama peneliti. Kami menyadari bahwa kami merupakan bagian dari permasalahan ini, dan diperlukan langkah-langkah untuk memutus rantai kultur perundungan akademik dalam penilaian sejawat. Pedoman baru bagi editor dan mitra bestari merupakan bagian dari solusi untuk mendorong komentar yang konstruktif, serta konsolidasi internal yang lebih kuat dalam proses penilaian sejawat.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document