scholarly journals Ethanol→Nicotine & Nicotine→Ethanol drug-sequence discriminations: Conditional stimulus control with two interoceptive drug elements in rats

Alcohol ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Troisi
1993 ◽  
Vol 46 (3b) ◽  
pp. 289-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula J. Durlach ◽  
Dairn O. Shane

Four experiments examined the sensitivity of anticipatory goal-tracking in the rat to stimulus-food contingency. Contingency was manipulated by varying the probability of food delivery in the absence of a food-tray-light or clicker conditional stimulus (CS), while holding constant the probability of food coincident with the CS. CS control of anticipatory food tray investigation was examined after a period of context extinction in all experiments. Acquisition of stimulus control was undermined by the scheduling of intertrial food deliveries (Experiment 1). The rate of intertrial food deliveries influenced subsequent acquisition of CS control when all intertrial food deliveries were omitted (Experiment 2). When intertrial food deliveries were added to the training regimen subsequent to acquisition of CS control, that control was impaired (Experiments 3 and 4).


1970 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric G. Heinemann ◽  
Sheila Chase

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 903-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Stromer ◽  
Harry A. Mackay

Normally capable children were first taught to touch in sequence each of a set of five physically dissimilar stimuli (Sequence A). Another set of stimuli was then used to train sequence B. Next, direct training established conditional control of the production of the A sequence and its reversal: in the presence of one printed word, touching the stimuli in the order A1→A2→A3→A4→A5 was reinforced; in the presence of another word, touching the stimuli in the order A5→A4→A3→A2→A1 was reinforced. During probe sessions, the printed words also exercised conditional control over production of the B sequence and its reversal for five of six subjects, suggesting the formation of stimulus classes. Four of these five subjects also performed mixed sequences under conditional control of the words (e.g., A1→B2→A3→B4→A5 and its reversal), verifying that the stimuli which occupied the same position in each sequence were members of the same class.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document